Sometimes, Right Or Wrong Does Not Depend On Perspective

Nothing to see here, just a Möbius strip casually defying your intuition with its one-sided smugness. Mathematicians get unreasonably excited about this topological rebel that manages to have only one surface and one edge despite looking like it should have two of each. Cut it in half lengthwise and instead of getting two separate bands, you get one longer loop with two twists. It's basically the mathematical equivalent of that person who always has to be different at parties.

The number 69 isn't just giggle-worthy in the bedroom—it's a mathematical marvel! In math, 69 is a semiprime number (product of two primes: 3×23), it's both the sum of five consecutive primes (7+11+13+17+21) AND Euler's totient of 69 is 44! No wonder mathematicians wake up with that enlightened glow! The duality of this number—mundane in one context, mind-blowing in another—is exactly why math nerds have that secret smile when someone mentions 69. Pure numerical poetry that makes mere mortals sleep but mathematicians ASCEND!

Content If the proof of a theorem is not immediately apparent, it may be because you are trying the wrong approach. Below are some effective methods of proof that might aim you in the right direction. Proof by obviousness: "The proof is so clear that it need not be mentioned." Proof by general agreement: "All in favor?.. Proof by imagination: "Well, we'll pretend it's true. Proof by convenience: "It would be very nice if it were true, so.. Proof by necessity: "It had better be true, or the entire structure of mathematics would crumble to the ground." Proof by plausibility: "It sounds good, so it must be true." Proof by intimidation: "Don't be stupid; of course it's true!" Proof by lack of sufficient time: "Because of the time constrait, I'lI leave the proof to you." Proof by postponement: "The proof for this is long and arduous, so it is given to you in the appendix." Proof by accident: "Hey, what have we here?!" Proof by insignificance: "Who really cares anyway?" Proof by mumbo-jumbo: Wo ф, 3,830*8=8, Proof by profanity: (example omitted) Proof by definition: "We define it to be true.! Proof by tautology: "It's true because it's true." Proof by plagarism: "As we see on page 289,..." Proof by lost reference: "I know I saw it somewhere....' Proof by calculus: "This proof requires calculus, so we'll skip it." Proof by terror: When intimidation fails Proof by lack of interest: "Does anyone really want to see this?" Proof by illegibility: E GED Proof by logic: "If it is on the problem sheet, it must be true!" Proof by majority rule: Only to be used if general agreement is impossible. Proof by clever variable choice: "Let A be the number such that this proof works.." Proof by tessellation: "This proof is the same as the last." Proof by divine word: " And the Lord said, 'Let it be true, and it was true Proof by stubbornness: "I don't care what you say- it is true." Proof by simplification: "This proof reduced to the statement I + 1 = 2." Proof by hasty generalization: "Well, it works for 17, so it works for all reals." Proof by deception: "Now everyone turn their backs. Proof by supplication: "Oh please, let it be true. Proof by poor analogy: "Well, it's just like...' Proof by avoidance: Limit of proof by postponement as it approaches infinity Proof by design: If it's not true in today's math, invent a new system in which it is. Proof by authority: "Well, Don Knuth says it's true, so it must be!" Proof by intuition: "I have this gut feeling.

When life gets complicated, Brian takes the mathematician's escape route! Instead of facing his problems, he literally rockets away using a Taylor series expansion - the mathematical equivalent of saying "I'll deal with this... approximately." For the uninitiated, Taylor approximation is a method that simplifies complex functions by using their derivatives at a specific point. It's like telling someone you'll be there "around 5-ish" instead of calculating exact travel time with traffic variables. Brian's not just avoiding the conversation - he's doing it with mathematical elegance! The final panel shows he literally transformed into the equation and soared away. Who needs emotional intelligence when you can reduce messy reality into a neat polynomial? Pure genius for avoiding awkward talks!

The eternal academic hierarchy, displayed in its natural habitat: a Venn diagram. Physicists claim they "can get laid," mathematicians "mock engineers," and engineers... well, they "can't win a Nobel Prize." The central punchline reveals the one thing uniting these feuding disciplines: everyone agrees they're "better than chemists." The scientific equivalent of siblings fighting over who gets to sit in the front seat, except with more equations and fewer Nobel Prizes for engineers. Just another day in the STEM family dysfunction.

The mathematical battle of the century! Someone on Quora is having an existential crisis about their virtual cattle farm. They're confused why multiplying 5 cows by 0 gives them 0 cows. "Where did the 5 go?!" they demand, as if their bovine buddies vanished into a mathematical black hole. It's the perfect showcase of someone who slept through basic arithmetic but is suddenly ready to challenge centuries of mathematical consensus. The cows didn't "go" anywhere, buddy—they were never part of the multiplication result to begin with! That's like asking where your sandwich went after you didn't make it. 🐄➗0=❓