Engineering Memes

The eternal divide between theoretical and practical approaches. Physics students memorize π and e to 15 decimal places as if the universe would collapse otherwise. Meanwhile, engineering students round to the nearest integer because bridges don't care about the 14th decimal place. One is having an existential crisis; the other is getting 8 hours of sleep. Both will argue they're right while drinking coffee at 3 AM before finals.

The eternal battle between theoretical and practical science! Physics majors live in a beautiful frictionless vacuum where pesky real-world factors like air resistance can be waved away with "negligible for calculation purposes." Meanwhile, engineering majors are busy building things that won't, you know, catastrophically fail in actual reality. That moment of horrified realization when the physics major remembers that objects don't actually fall at the same rate outside of textbook problems... *chef's kiss* Pure academic chaos! Next time your parachute works, thank an engineer who remembered air exists! 🧪💥

Engineering students preparing for finals is basically a crash course in cognitive dissonance. Left brain: "I should thoroughly understand these complex thermodynamic principles from this 800-page textbook." Right brain: "YouTube man explain ANSYS in 10 minutes, me pass test now." The desperate scramble to balance proper education with last-minute shortcuts is the true engineering feat here. Nobody mentions this particular law of thermodynamics: knowledge absorption is inversely proportional to exam proximity.

That moment when thousands of humans decide to test the tensile strength limits of the Golden Gate Bridge. Those suspension cables are sweating harder than a freshman during their first physics exam! The vertical cables making that strained face is just *chef's kiss* - they're carrying tons of weight while the main cables are desperately trying to maintain composure. Engineering students take note: this is what we call "real-world stress testing" without the consent of the original engineers. The bridge designers probably never imagined their safety factor calculations would include "what if half of San Francisco stands on it at once?"

Scientists discussing fusion reactors is like watching toddlers discover cookies. "I made a new way to generate energy!" says the first researcher, expecting applause. The second researcher, barely awake: "New... or steam?" Then comes the technical knockout - helion fusion reactors generate current directly without boiling water like those basic tokamak reactors. The bottom panels capture that rare moment when a physicist experiences actual human emotion. Revolutionary energy tech that doesn't involve glorified kettles? Groundbreaking stuff. Next they'll tell us fusion is only 20 years away... again.

Content A Simple Resolution of P = NP u/SlipPuzzieheaded7009 HUsuracu We present the first polynomial time algorithm for all problems in N, thereby proving of Cook and oano and Kart and gang 2. our method extends Valiant and gang's algebraic enumeration techniques 3 and 7 (1014 introduction The P vs NP problem- in Cook's 1971 theorem-provino work 1 and Karo's 1972 compilations of IF-complete problems 2 asks whether every problem whose solution can be verified in (n" time can also be solved in O(n) time We prove P = NP by devising a polv time solver that swn thesises circuit constructions a la vallant and gang.3 with certicate guided branching methods (Papadimitriou and gang 4). Our proof is rigorous and breathtakinglv concise mv wite's bovtriend told me so 5) Preliminaries All prior efforts are trivial and naive. Cook-Levin's reduction I is fine: SAI solvers are cute party tricks: POP theorems 6 are delightful and humorous. None saw the obvious that we have. Vain 'Theorem P= NP Proof Left as an exercise for the reader Results and Discussion SAT. CLIOUE. and Hamiltonian Cycle solved in O(n?) time Acknowledgments Tacknowledse. on bebslf of the entire mathematies community. the unparglleled senius of ruself Reterences . A. "The Complexitv of Theorem-Proving Procedures." STOC '71. ACM. 1971 2. Karp. R. M. "Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems." in Complexity of Computer Valiant, L. G. "The Complexity of Enumeration and Reliability Problems." SIAM J. Comput. vol. 8. no. 3, pp. 410-421. 1979. :contentReference oaicite:2 index=2 4. Papadimitrion. C. H.. et al. *On the Complexity of Local Search in Combinatorial Optimize 6. Arora. S.. Safra. S. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP"

Content r/mathmemes u/uvero & • Engineering • 1d Fibonacci's repost, day 22 | If this gets at least 17711 upvotes, then tomorrow I'I upload a screenshot of today's post and yesterday's post Combinatorics Fibonacci's repost, day 20 I If this gets at least 6765 upvotes, then tomorrow ill upload a screenshot of todays post and yesterdays post Fibonacci's repost, day 21 | If this gets at least 10946 upvotes, then tomorrow I'll upload a screensTOcoa odav's post and yesterdays post + 10.1k 4 28.7k • 8 B [ 512 О 272 17: 2 759 © 1.6k r/mathmemes u/uvero & • Engineering • 22h Fibonacci's repost, day 23 | If this gets at least 28657 upvotes, then tomorrow I'I upload a screenshot of today's post and yesterday's post Combinatorics Fibonacci's repost, day 21 | If this gets at least 10946 upvotes, then tomorrow I'll upload a screensnot or todays post and yesterdays posi Fibonacci's repost, day 22 | If this gets at least 17711 upvotes, then tomorrow I'll upload a screenshot or todays post and yesterdays pos O 172 33.1k ~ 759 • 290 O 271 1.4k

Content Does your dog bite? No, but it can hurt you in other ways. PRORARI EMPLORATI TO SEND AN 'YSTEM IS FOR SPACE EVER BE VIABLE OTHER STAR SYSTEMS

Content "To know your enemy, you must become your enemy." Me studying fluid mechanics: @engineering universe

Content VisualParadigm see cool idea like metallic glass lost interest because Icant afford it look up idea and want to do it discover I cant go down research paperrabbithole See if Ican do that without spending any money Discover research papers cost moneyso use schub Look at cost and dis cover it costs thousands of dollars prototype on paper and make basic CAD model