Executive Order Against The Fourth State Of Matter

Content Me panic-reviewing gas law calculations at 2 AM for my 7 AM exam. Because n is constant, we can use Equation 10.8. Solve: Rearranging Equation 10.8 to solve for V2 gives ½ = 4 x - (6.0 L) 1.0 atm /252 K 295 K, = 11L 0.45 atm/ check: The result appears reasonable. Notice that the felt temperatures moles, fits the initial voltaebya ratio of pressures endle volume connect sim, the expect that alecreasing pressure will cause the yetuense. increase Sintany, we expect that decre sion id cause the volume to decrease afore st at the dister. in pressures is raote aramatic than the difference in temperateres Thus, we shag expect the effect of the pressure change to predominate in determining the final yo. ume, as it does. PRACTICE EXERCISE A 0.50-mol sample of oxygen gas is confined at 0 °C in a cylinder with a morade piston, such as that shown in Figure 10.12. The gas has an initial pressure of 10 at. The piston then compresses the gas so that its final volume is halt the initial volume The final pressure of the gas is 2.2 atm. What is the final temperature of the gas in degrees Celsius? 10.5 FURTHER APPLICI OF THE IDEAL-GAS EQUATION The ideal-gas equation can be used to determine many relationships involving the physical properties of gases. In this section we use it first to define the rela tionship between the density of a gas and its molar mass, and then to calculate the volumes of gases formed or consumed in chemical reactions Gas Densities and Molar Mass The ideal-gas equation allows us to calculate gas density from the molar mas pressure, and temperature of the gas. Recall that density has the units of me per unit volume (d = m/V). a (Section 1.4) We can arrange the gas equat to obtain similar units, moles per unit volume, n/V: P V RT If we multiply both sides of this equation//// @ sergM,

Physics folks have the most fascinating double standard! They'll happily simplify a complex farm animal into a perfect sphere with zero friction when solving problems (because who needs reality?), but heaven forbid you mix up speed and velocity at a party! 😱 The frictionless cow in vacuum is a classic physics simplification trope - making ridiculous assumptions to make math easier. But mention that you went "really fast" instead of specifying your directional velocity, and suddenly they're foaming at the mouth about vector quantities! This selective rage is basically the unwritten law of physics discussions. Oversimplify the entire universe? Brilliant! Use casual language about motion? Scientific blasphemy!

Teaching physics by trolling students with astrology and flat Earth conspiracies? Bold strategy. This teacher's worksheet starts with astrology nonsense, then transitions to "But what does science say about this claim? Are you lazy because you are a Gemini? Or is it all a bunch of bullsh*t?" before hitting them with actual gravitational calculations. The flat Earth section is even better - making students calculate how fast a disc-shaped Earth would need to accelerate upward to simulate gravity (9.8 m/s²). Then casually dropping that the Earth would exceed light speed within a year. Nothing says "welcome to physics" like calculating the mathematical impossibility of conspiracy theories. Either this teacher is getting fired or winning educator of the year. No in-between.

The gap between amateur theorizing and academic physics is perfectly captured by this wolf's hopeful expression. Poor guy thinks having "theories" means something in the scientific world! In actual physics, a theory isn't just a cool idea you had while watching YouTube at 2 AM—it's a rigorously tested framework supported by mountains of evidence and mathematical validation. No wonder the college ghosted faster than particles in quantum tunneling. Next time, buddy, maybe try submitting to arXiv instead of howling your ideas into the void!

The Sun, just sitting there in space, casually turning 600 million tons of hydrogen into helium every second without anyone asking. Nuclear fusion so intense it's literally visible from 93 million miles away. Meanwhile, humans struggle to keep fusion reactors running for more than a few seconds without them exploding. The Sun's been flexing on us for 4.6 billion years and plans to continue this unnecessary power move for another 5 billion. Such a show-off.

The classic case of geometry betraying physics. Those 90-degree corners aren't just architectural features—they're thermal hotspots. Heat transfer increases at junctions due to converging thermal gradients, essentially turning your balcony into a scientific demonstration of thermal conductivity. The commenter's deadpan "It's because the corners are 90 degrees" is both literally true (they are right angles) and a brilliant temperature pun. Next time someone asks why scientists have no sense of humor, show them this perfect example of thermal dynamics wordplay that absolutely melted the internet.