Academia
Ai
Astronomy
Biology
Chemistry
Climate
Conspiracy
Earth-science
Engineering
Evolution
Geology
Mathematicians ranking their proof techniques like they're competitive Smash Bros characters, and honestly? The chaos is *chef's kiss*.
S-tier naturally includes "Proof by asking a toddler on the street" and "Proof by intimidation" because nothing says mathematical rigor like scaring your theorem into submission or consulting a three-year-old's unfiltered wisdom. Meanwhile, "Direct Proof" is chilling in A-tier like it's not literally the foundation of mathematics—apparently being straightforward is overrated.
B-tier is where the modern era shines: "Proof by ChatGPT" sitting comfortably next to "Proof by Stack Overflow" because why do the work yourself when the internet hivemind exists? "Proof by Intuition" is there too, which is just fancy talk for "trust me bro, it feels right."
Down in D-tier we've got "Proof by Exhaustion" and "Closed Chain Inference"—the methods so tedious that even mathematicians are like "yeah, it works, but at what cost?" Your wrist hurts, your soul is drained, but hey, QED.
The real crime? "Proof by Induction" languishing in C-tier when it's literally carrying half of discrete mathematics on its back. Put some respect on the domino effect's name!
