I Made A Function That Outputs Endless Curly Brackets

Dating troubles? Engineering solutions! This guy took "reading between the lines" to a whole new frequency. When his crush was giving him those confusing hot-and-cold vibes, he whipped out the oscilloscope and decomposed her mixed signals into their fundamental frequencies. Because nothing says romance like transforming emotional uncertainty into a neat mathematical series! Next up: using differential equations to calculate the exact moment she'll friend-zone him. Engineers don't get ghosted—they just experience signal loss.

Newton's second law: F = ma. But in this case, "F" is labeled "Fysics" (the budget spelling of Physics), "m" is labeled "math," and "a" is labeled "a whole lot of tears." The perfect equation for every physics student's experience. The force required to pass physics equals your mathematical ability multiplied by an excessive amount of suffering. Whoever made this clearly spent as much effort on spelling "physics" as most students do on their homework the night before it's due.

This is mathematical savagery at its finest! The first line tells someone to go play with their "square root of negative friend" - which is imaginary because you can't take the square root of a negative number in real mathematics! Then it gets even more brutal with formal set theory notation stating that the intersection of the person's friends and the commenters on the thread equals the empty set. Translation: none of the people commenting are your friends! The final mathematical burn uses limits to say that as comments approach infinity, the number of f***s given approaches zero. Pure mathematical destruction!

Nothing says "I've lost my will to live" quite like staring at MATLAB for 12 straight hours. The pupil dilates for things we love? Mine just rolls back into my skull when I see that colorful wave logo. Engineering students know the truth—MATLAB isn't a programming language, it's a psychological endurance test disguised as software. The only thing expanding here is my caffeine tolerance and deadline anxiety. That blank, dead-eyed stare in the second frame? That's the look of someone who just realized they've been debugging the same plot function since Tuesday.

This flowchart is what happens when career counselors have a mental breakdown. Engineering? Only if you're "good with things." Chemistry? Congratulations on your future as a "fussy pedant." And let's not forget Computer Science, perfect for those who prefer "slow, indirect evil" over the more efficient varieties. The beautiful part is how it nails the existential crisis of every STEM student. "Why do you want to major in a STEM field?" Options include "curiosity" (adorable), "to save the planet" (delusional), or my personal favorite, the dawning realization that STEM was supposed to involve actual plants for Biology majors. After 30 years of teaching, I can confirm this is approximately 87% accurate. The missing 13% is the path where you choose your major based on which department has the least uncomfortable chairs in the lecture hall.

The cognitive regression of mathematical prowess is real! As children, we're tackling three-digit addition with fingers flying (and getting it wrong - 578 + 328 = 906, not 575). Fast forward to adulthood, and we're double-checking basic arithmetic on calculators. The human brain: capable of developing quantum physics but somehow forgetting how to add without silicon assistance. It's like our neurons decided "We don't do math anymore, that's what phones are for!" The ultimate evolutionary trade-off - we've outsourced our computational abilities to technology and freed up brain space for remembering Netflix passwords instead.