Eight Is Equal Or Greater Than Eight

Finally! A dating app where mathematicians can shine! When asked for "proofs," most people send selfies, but our hero is ready with ACTUAL mathematical proofs... only to pull the classic textbook move of "the proof is trivial and left as an exercise for the reader." That's the mathematical equivalent of saying "I have a girlfriend but she goes to another school." Dating and differential equations don't mix, but at least they both involve finding solutions that satisfy initial conditions!

The eternal relationship between mathematicians and physicists! Pure mathematicians are out there creating beautiful abstract theories with no concern for real-world applications. Meanwhile, physicists swoop in like Bugs Bunny with the Soviet hammer and sickle, claiming "OUR MATH" to explain the universe's mysteries. The number of times a physicist has repurposed some obscure mathematical concept that was developed decades earlier is truly the greatest love story in science. Mathematicians build it, physicists steal it, and somehow the universe makes sense!

The classic conditional probability trap that separates the statisticians from the button-mashers. With a 50% crit chance, the probability of both hits being crits isn't 50% — it's 25%. Each hit is an independent event, so you multiply the probabilities: 0.5 × 0.5 = 0.25 or 25%. Watching gamers argue about this is like observing undergrads discover Bayes' theorem for the first time. The number of PhDs who still get this wrong would shock you.

The formula looks like someone sneezed on their calculator, yet somehow it's mathematically correct. Ramanujan just casually derived this pi formula while other mathematicians were still struggling with basic fractions. The reply asking "name one thing this country gave to the world" with India's flag is the mathematical equivalent of dropping the mic. Like, oh I don't know, just one of the most brilliant mathematical minds who derived complex formulas through intuition while the rest of us need three attempts to calculate a restaurant tip.

When mathematicians spot asterisks (*) instead of proper multiplication dots (·) or the cross symbol (×) in an equation, it's like finding a typo in the Constitution. The tweet shows a statistical formula from a government document where they've committed this cardinal sin of notation. In programming languages like Python, the asterisk makes perfect sense for multiplication, but in formal mathematical notation? That's basically announcing "I haven't opened a math textbook since middle school." The formula itself is trying to look sophisticated, but the notation is screaming amateur hour. It's like wearing a lab coat with the price tag still attached.

Nothing says "physics problem" quite like turning living creatures into perfect geometric shapes. In the real world, cats are complex biological organisms with non-uniform density and irregular shapes. But in physics? Square that feline! Reduce it to a cube with uniform mass distribution! Next week we'll model a cow as a perfect sphere in a vacuum. Because why let reality get in the way of a solvable equation? The hallmark of theoretical physics: if nature doesn't cooperate with your math, just redefine nature.