When Your Dad Is A Machine Learning Engineer

Behold! The pinnacle of modern engineering - "just don't crash, pretty please!" 🤣 The meme shows coordinated drones flying in formation, with Tech Insider claiming they used "coding and algorithms" to prevent collisions. Meanwhile, the comment below reveals the ACTUAL code: if(goingToCrashIntoEachOther) { dont(); } It's like telling your roommate "if you're going to eat my leftovers, don't." Revolutionary programming technique! Next up: solving world hunger with if(hungry) { eat(); } . Why didn't NASA think of this?!

So much for the robot uprising! While we're busy building bunkers for the AI apocalypse, our digital overlords are busy answering pressing questions like "is tennessine a metal?" (which, by the way, is element 117, an artificially created halogen that exists for milliseconds before decaying). The most dangerous thing this AI is doing is correcting our chemistry homework. World domination status: pending basic periodic table mastery.

When you're just excited about the Enigma machine vs. when you're Alan Turing who casually broke the "unbreakable" Nazi code and basically invented computer science while he was at it. The rest of us are still trying to remember our email passwords. Some people get excited about cryptography; Turing revolutionized it before breakfast.

The perfect encapsulation of corporate tech babble meets fundamental physics. Someone with impressive credentials just casually decided to "improve" Einstein's iconic equation by... adding AI to it. Because clearly what mass-energy equivalence was missing all these years was a sprinkle of machine learning buzzwords. The single-word "What" response from an actual physicist is the scientific equivalent of a facepalm. This is what happens when LinkedIn influencers try to sound profound while demonstrating they understand neither physics nor AI. The restraint shown by the physicist deserves a Nobel Prize of its own.

Content If the proof of a theorem is not immediately apparent, it may be because you are trying the wrong approach. Below are some effective methods of proof that might aim you in the right direction. Proof by obviousness: "The proof is so clear that it need not be mentioned." Proof by general agreement: "All in favor?.. Proof by imagination: "Well, we'll pretend it's true. Proof by convenience: "It would be very nice if it were true, so.. Proof by necessity: "It had better be true, or the entire structure of mathematics would crumble to the ground." Proof by plausibility: "It sounds good, so it must be true." Proof by intimidation: "Don't be stupid; of course it's true!" Proof by lack of sufficient time: "Because of the time constrait, I'lI leave the proof to you." Proof by postponement: "The proof for this is long and arduous, so it is given to you in the appendix." Proof by accident: "Hey, what have we here?!" Proof by insignificance: "Who really cares anyway?" Proof by mumbo-jumbo: Wo ф, 3,830*8=8, Proof by profanity: (example omitted) Proof by definition: "We define it to be true.! Proof by tautology: "It's true because it's true." Proof by plagarism: "As we see on page 289,..." Proof by lost reference: "I know I saw it somewhere....' Proof by calculus: "This proof requires calculus, so we'll skip it." Proof by terror: When intimidation fails Proof by lack of interest: "Does anyone really want to see this?" Proof by illegibility: E GED Proof by logic: "If it is on the problem sheet, it must be true!" Proof by majority rule: Only to be used if general agreement is impossible. Proof by clever variable choice: "Let A be the number such that this proof works.." Proof by tessellation: "This proof is the same as the last." Proof by divine word: " And the Lord said, 'Let it be true, and it was true Proof by stubbornness: "I don't care what you say- it is true." Proof by simplification: "This proof reduced to the statement I + 1 = 2." Proof by hasty generalization: "Well, it works for 17, so it works for all reals." Proof by deception: "Now everyone turn their backs. Proof by supplication: "Oh please, let it be true. Proof by poor analogy: "Well, it's just like...' Proof by avoidance: Limit of proof by postponement as it approaches infinity Proof by design: If it's not true in today's math, invent a new system in which it is. Proof by authority: "Well, Don Knuth says it's true, so it must be!" Proof by intuition: "I have this gut feeling.

Engineering students don't need friends when they can build their own walking companions. That robot is probably the only entity that understands your differential equations jokes. The irony of creating advanced humanoid robotics while lacking basic human connection is peak engineering department culture. At least the robot won't borrow your calculator and never return it.