My Wife Bought Hexagonal Ice Trays And I Got To Explain How Ice Is Already Hexagonal!

Content point of les 30. e alone. e alone. cup of was solute a solvent n but no det ) Plasma e at the si 1) Plasma with very their contes 1) Plasma of potente d) Plasti riment in my at happens by line se substance is heated at a constant rate. Which line segments represent heat being converted into potential energy? a) Aand C b). BandD c) Aand B d) Band C What phase of matter would the substance be at room temperature (about 24°C)? a) Solid b) Liquid c) Gas d) Plasma 31. As time goes by, heat is constantly added to the substance. In which portion of the graph would you expect the particles of matter to have the most energy? a) A b) B c) C d) D 32. Which of these substances is NOT an element? a) salt b) helium c) oxygen d) sodium 33. Water comes from your sink at home is ..... a) an element b) a mixture c) a substance d) a compound You accidentally dump salt into the half-full pepper shaker. You have just created a) a solute b) a mixture c) a solution d) a gigantic rift in the space-time continuum. 33. Sugar is stirred into a glass of water. The sugar is. a) the solute b) the solvent c) the mixture d) made by combining Na with CI. 36. The most common solvent found on Earth is.... a) helium b) paint thinner c) sugar d) water 37 Which below is NOT an example of a mixture? a) salt water b) the Earth's atmosphere c) dumping sand into a bag of marbles. d) These are ALL examples of mixtures. 38. Why is ice NOT a mixture? a) It's made out of just hydrogen. b) It's a compound. It's still just water. 9) You can separate What the ice is made out of. d) . Water is a mixture C8 253 8

Physics professors: "Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed." Meanwhile, ChatGPT's servers vaporizing 1000 liters of cooling water into the void dimension every time you ask it to explain why your crush isn't texting back. The First Law of AI Thermodynamics: Conservation of Energy applies to everything except data centers, which convert electricity directly into existential dread and slightly warmer oceans.

The scientific community's reaction spectrum is hilariously predictable. Basic science? "Ooh, magic!" Nuclear energy? "Run for your lives!" But AI? That's where we transcend from scientists to existential poets trapped in digital purgatory. The progression from mild excitement to nuclear panic to full-blown existential crisis perfectly captures how we've collectively lost our minds about technology. Notice how we skip the rational middle ground entirely—it's either "cool trick" or "we're all doomed." Classic scientist behavior: either underwhelmed or convinced the apocalypse is imminent. No in-between.

The classic dating miscommunication strikes again! Two people connect over their mutual love of "train models" - but they're talking about completely different things. He's thinking of actual miniature railroad models (choo-choo!), while she's referring to machine learning models for training AI algorithms (beep-boop!). It's basically the modern tech version of "I thought you meant that kind of Python!" The diagram she shows is a typical neural network flowchart - the kind data scientists dream about while the model train enthusiast is busy perfecting his tiny railroad crossing. Two nerds, two worlds, one hilarious misunderstanding!

Mathematicians watching AI learn matrix multiplication in 0.2 seconds after they've dedicated their entire careers to optimizing it by 0.0001%. The tweet perfectly captures that moment when you realize your PhD thesis on computational efficiency just became obsolete because some neural network decided to flex. Pour one out for all the linear algebra professors whose "this will be relevant for your future" speech just got invalidated by a few lines of code.

The classic "make up a complicated equation and pretend it solves everything" approach! This physicist is trolling economists by creating a nonsensical formula that supposedly revolutionizes global trade economics by—wait for it—just adding "AI" to the end. The equation itself is mathematical gibberish dressed up in fancy symbols, but adding "AI" magically makes it revolutionary. It's basically the academic equivalent of saying "but what if we used blockchain?" to solve any problem. The unfinished sentence at the end is the cherry on top of this magnificent satire of how AI gets thrown into discussions where it doesn't belong.