The eternal struggle between mathematical purity and statistical pragmatism! Pure mathematicians pride themselves on elegant proofs and logical necessity, while statisticians are over here like "n=30 is good enough for Central Limit Theorem, don't @ me."
The magical number 30 appears everywhere in statistics because it's roughly where sample distributions become normal enough for parametric tests. No deep mathematical reason - just a practical threshold where things start working. It's the statistical equivalent of "eh, close enough" and I'm dying at how perfectly Patrick represents every stats professor I've ever had.
      
              
              Academia
            
              
              Ai
            
              
              Astronomy
            
              
              Biology
            
              
              Chemistry
            
              
              Climate
            
              
              Conspiracy
            
              
              Earth-science
            
              
              Engineering
            
              
              Evolution
            
              
              Geology