Sample size Memes

Posts tagged with Sample size

Two More Data Points Changes Everything

Two More Data Points Changes Everything
The perfect representation of statistical significance in underfunded research. Two additional data points and suddenly your p-value drops below 0.05, transforming "disappointing results" into "groundbreaking discovery." Happens every Tuesday in my lab. The difference between rejection and publication is often just a couple of desperate measurements taken at 2 AM while the grant deadline looms.

Statistical Certainty In The Sock Drawer

Statistical Certainty In The Sock Drawer
When someone casually says "probably," statisticians don't mess around. That p-value of 0.98 with a sample size of 500 and tiny standard deviation of 0.021? That's not "probably" โ€“ that's "I'd bet my tenure on it." Nothing strikes fear into the heart of a math nerd like someone using statistical certainty to warn you away from their sock drawer. Whatever's in there must be worse than that time the department tried to combine the faculty holiday party with peer review.

The Perfect Visual Proof Of Sample Size Importance

The Perfect Visual Proof Of Sample Size Importance
Statistical reality hitting harder than any textbook! Left side shows a perfect 5-star rating based on just 19 reviews, while right side shows 4.6 stars from 2,280 reviews. The facial expressions say it all - small samples give deceptively "perfect" results while larger datasets reveal the messy truth. Next time someone brags about their "flawless" preliminary results, just point to their tiny n-value and watch them squirm. Statistical significance has never been so savage!

The Sacred Number 30: Statistics Vs. Pure Math

The Sacred Number 30: Statistics Vs. Pure Math
The eternal struggle between mathematical purity and statistical pragmatism! Pure mathematicians pride themselves on elegant proofs and logical necessity, while statisticians are over here like "n=30 is good enough for Central Limit Theorem, don't @ me." The magical number 30 appears everywhere in statistics because it's roughly where sample distributions become normal enough for parametric tests. No deep mathematical reason - just a practical threshold where things start working. It's the statistical equivalent of "eh, close enough" and I'm dying at how perfectly Patrick represents every stats professor I've ever had.

The Statistical Truth Behind Five Stars

The Statistical Truth Behind Five Stars
Behold! The perfect visual proof of why statisticians get twitchy about small sample sizes! On the left, a perfect 5-star rating based on a measly 19 reviews. On the right, a slightly lower 4.6 stars but with a whopping 2,280 reviews. Which would you trust? The second one, obviously! That first rating is like claiming you've discovered the perfect diet because you tried it on your pet goldfish and he looked happier. Statistics in the wild - more revealing than my lab coat after taco Tuesday! Remember kids, a small n value is just an anecdote wearing a fancy mathematical hat!

Is This Truly Random?

Is This Truly Random?
Statisticians staring suspiciously at coin flips is the ultimate trust issues mood. While normies see a simple 50/50 chance, statisticians are mentally running chi-square tests and questioning if the universe itself is gaslighting them. "Random? Or are you hiding patterns from me, you sneaky little coin?" The eternal paranoia of someone who knows that true randomness is about as common as a useful peer review comment. Next time you flip a coin, remember there's a statistician somewhere twitching at the thought of your inadequate sample size.