New Triangle Just Dropped!

Behold, the infamous "challenging brain teaser" that's about as challenging as remembering to breathe. From the equations a+a+a=3 and b+b+b=6, we get a=1 and b=2. So a b = 1 2 = 1. The answer's literally just 1. I've seen more complex problems in children's cereal boxes. This is what happens when clickbait meets elementary arithmetic and calls itself a "maths master" challenge. Next they'll ask us to solve for x in "x+1=2" and call it quantum computing.

Nothing triggers a mathematician's fight-or-flight response quite like hearing decimal places butchered. It's like nails on a chalkboard for anyone who's spent more than five minutes in a STEM field. The number is 7.92 - that's "seven point nine two." Not "ninety-two" after the decimal. That's just mathematical blasphemy. Precision matters, people! Next thing you know, they'll be rounding π to 3 and claiming close enough is good enough for engineering. The horror.

The ultimate scientific flex! This Venn diagram perfectly captures the academic food chain where physicists reign supreme. According to this diagram, physicists can mock engineers, get paid well, AND be better than chemists—the STEM field trifecta! Meanwhile, mathematicians are stuck just mocking engineers, engineers can't win Nobel Prizes, and chemists... well, they're apparently everyone's punching bag. The center suggests that the ultimate achievement in science is being better than chemists. Whoever made this was definitely a physicist with an axe to grind and a superiority complex the size of a supermassive black hole. The interdepartmental shade is strong with this one!

Finally! A dating app where mathematicians can shine! When asked for "proofs," most people send selfies, but our hero is ready with ACTUAL mathematical proofs... only to pull the classic textbook move of "the proof is trivial and left as an exercise for the reader." That's the mathematical equivalent of saying "I have a girlfriend but she goes to another school." Dating and differential equations don't mix, but at least they both involve finding solutions that satisfy initial conditions!

The perfect statistical paradox doesn't exi— This masterpiece illustrates sampling bias in its purest form. The researchers proudly announce that 99.8% of people "love responding to surveys" based on... wait for it... survey responses. Meanwhile, the people who hate surveys never filled it out in the first place. It's like concluding that 100% of fish love fishing hooks based on the ones you've caught. Statisticians are currently experiencing physical pain looking at this. The remaining 0.2% were probably just filling it out under duress from a particularly persistent grad student.

The joke is pure mathematical brilliance! This is playing on "L'Hôpital's rule" - a calculus technique for evaluating limits that seem impossible at first glance. The creator hilariously admits they "failed maths" by mistaking the mathematical theorem for "Le Hospital's rule" (literally a hospital with a French flag)! It's that perfect self-deprecating math humor that unites everyone who's ever stared blankly at a calculus problem thinking "this might as well be in another language." Calculus students everywhere are simultaneously laughing and having flashbacks to differential equations!