Neglecting The Higher Terms

Mathematicians watching AI learn matrix multiplication in 0.2 seconds after they've dedicated their entire careers to optimizing it by 0.0001%. The tweet perfectly captures that moment when you realize your PhD thesis on computational efficiency just became obsolete because some neural network decided to flex. Pour one out for all the linear algebra professors whose "this will be relevant for your future" speech just got invalidated by a few lines of code.

Every math enthusiast has experienced that awkward moment when someone discovers your secret love for equations and immediately assumes you're a human calculator. The guy's face in the last panel says it all—the silent internal screaming of "Just because I enjoy abstract algebra doesn't mean I can instantly calculate your restaurant tip in my head!" Mathematics appreciation and computational skills are completely different neural pathways, but try explaining that while someone's staring at you expectantly, waiting for you to divide 378 by 17 without blinking.

Engineers living in their own mathematical multiverse! Three Spider-Men pointing at each other, but they've transformed into the unholy trinity of engineering constants: e (Euler's number), π (pi), and √g (square root of gravity). To the untrained eye, these mathematical abominations pointing fingers is CHAOS. To engineers? Just another Tuesday! They'll happily round π to 3, treat √g as 3, and e as 3... because who needs precision when you've got deadlines? The building might lean a bit, but hey—it's within acceptable parameters! *twirls calculator maniacally*

The eternal struggle of quantum physics students trying to grasp Dirac notation while their professor casually drops the line "transforms a ket state to a bra." First-years frantically looking around wondering if they accidentally enrolled in Quantum Lingerie 101. The dagger operation (†) in quantum mechanics is actually transforming mathematical objects - turning column vectors (kets) into row vectors (bras). Nothing to do with undergarments, despite what your confused brain might think when half-asleep during morning lectures. Meanwhile, physicists have been giggling about this terminology since Dirac invented it in the 1930s. Ninety years of the same joke and we still haven't outgrown it.

The ultimate mathematical Halloween bamboozle! These trick-or-treaters aren't wearing costumes at all—they're ACTUALLY rational numbers (√2, π, sin30°) masquerading as irrational numbers and complex functions! 🤓 It's the numerical equivalent of showing up to a costume party dressed as yourself. The vampire thought they were something they're not—a delicious mathematical irony since √2 is famously irrational, π transcends rationality, and sin30° equals 0.5 (perfectly rational)! The numbers are literally "dressing up" as what they truly are while claiming it's a disguise. That's some next-level mathematical trolling that would make Pythagoras roll in his grave!

The duality of the modern researcher. Claiming to despise statistical analysis during methodology discussions, then frantically refreshing Spotify Wrapped to see if their music taste is statistically significant compared to the general population. Same people who say "p-values are meaningless" will fight to the death defending why they're in the top 0.5% of Taylor Swift listeners. Data suddenly becomes fascinating when it's about your personal habits instead of your research variables.