Me In Every Proof Class

When your brain starts interpreting "lol" as |o| (absolute value of o), you've officially crossed the mathematical point of no return. For the uninitiated, absolute value gives you the distance of a number from zero, ignoring the sign. So the person is seeing internet slang as mathematical notation—a classic symptom of what we in the field call "terminal mathematics exposure." The irony of the username "the-real-numbers" responding with "lol" is just *chef's kiss* perfection. Mathematical brainrot is irreversible. Trust me, I've tried to cure mine with alcohol. Didn't work. Just calculated the ethanol concentration instead.

This meme is pure mathematical torture disguised as a simple question! "How many triangles are here?" looks innocent until you actually try counting them. With all those intersecting lines, the number of triangles is somewhere between "too many" and "I need therapy now." It's like asking how many stars are in the universe while handing you a broken telescope. Even math professors would break out in cold sweats trying to solve this one. The title "Simplify Using Kirchhoff's Laws" is the chef's kiss of mockery - suggesting you could somehow use electrical circuit principles to escape this geometric nightmare. Spoiler alert: you can't! This is why mathematicians drink coffee by the gallon.

Even Einstein, with his revolutionary theories on relativity, apparently followed the same mathematical process as the rest of us mortals. The universal mathematical workflow: meticulously write down the problem, then proceed directly to emotional breakdown. No intermediate steps required. The efficiency is undeniable. I've personally tested this method through three degrees and can confirm its reproducibility across all mathematical disciplines.

The evolution of mathematical notation from peasant to galaxy brain! First we have the basic "e^x" - what every calculus student scribbles. Then the slightly more sophisticated "exp(x)" that makes you look like you've actually read a textbook. But the final form? "Inn't (x)" - a notation so absurd it's clearly a play on "isn't" while completely butchering exponential function notation. It's the mathematical equivalent of wearing a tuxedo to a swimming pool. The gradual brain illumination perfectly captures how mathematicians think they're achieving transcendence with each new notation, when really they're just making things unnecessarily complicated for the rest of us. Next semester I'll be teaching "squiggly line over upside-down horseshoe of x" as the superior form.

The red circle highlights all the trigonometry and logarithm buttons that haunted our math classes! For most people, these functions might as well be decorative stickers. We spent weeks learning SOH-CAH-TOA only to graduate and never compute a single tangent again. Meanwhile, the humble addition and multiplication buttons are doing 99% of the heavy lifting in our daily calculations. Those sin, cos, and tan buttons are basically the appendix of the calculator world – technically they serve a purpose, but most of us are living just fine without ever using them!

Those aren't haunted castles—they're Halstead's integral symbols. The student stares at the diverging paths, knowing both lead to mathematical doom. Every exam-taker has faced this fork: do I attempt the horrifying triple integral on the left, or the equally terrifying partial differential on the right? Meanwhile, the badly written X's mock us from below, like a professor who deliberately uses the same symbol for three different variables. Classic academic horror story.