The Worst Exams Are Those With All Aids Allowed

The instruction says "Write as a product" and the student literally wrote the expression multiplied by 1. Technically correct - the best kind of correct in mathematics. This is what happens when you spend 14 hours debugging code and your brain starts interpreting instructions with machine-like literalism. The professor probably wanted (x+y)(x+y), but sometimes malicious compliance is the only joy left in a STEM degree.

When you start solving an algebra problem, it's like embarking on a wild mathematical safari! First, you're just innocently writing equations. Then suddenly—POOF!—terms start cancelling each other like they're having an existential crisis. More cancellations! Numbers disappearing! Variables vanishing! And after all that chaotic mathematical carnage, you end up with the mind-blowing revelation that x = x. 🤦‍♂️ That's when you realize you've spent 20 minutes proving absolutely nothing except that something equals itself. It's the mathematical equivalent of walking in circles and ending up exactly where you started!

The chemistry hierarchy perfectly captured in feline form! General chemistry is the confident cat on the left, comforting organic chemistry (the tired, defeated-looking cat) after another brutal reaction mechanism problem set. Meanwhile, biochemistry (the chaotic white cat in the background) is just vibing in its own bizarre world of metabolic pathways and enzyme kinetics. Every chemistry student knows this progression—from the relatively straightforward general principles to the soul-crushing complexity of organic synthesis, only to discover biochemistry is basically organic chemistry on steroids with extra steps. The silent screaming in organic chem's eyes speaks to generations of students who've battled with chair conformations at 3 AM.

Spent 7 years mastering molecular orbital theory just to be ignored at parties while the guy who can draw a perfect hexagon with two triangles gets all the attention. That benzene-drawing skill is apparently the pinnacle of chemical attractiveness. Meanwhile, my dissertation on catalytic mechanisms collects dust. The real chemistry was the social rejection we experienced along the way.

This is what happens when mathematicians get bored on Twitter! The post brilliantly maps profanity onto complex number theory, suggesting that expletives follow the same structure as mathematical fields. "Fractional f-words" would be like 0.5 expletives, "absolute f-words" imply both positive and negative versions (just like |-5| = |5| = 5), and "imaginary f-words" parallel the imaginary numbers like i . The reply adds a delightful correction about norm spaces and isomorphisms that's peak math-nerd pedantry. Next time someone swears, just ask if they're using the real or imaginary component of their expletive field.

The philosophical gun-to-your-head approach to settling the greatest debate in mathematics! Nothing says "let's have a calm intellectual discussion" like Gru from Despicable Me threatening you with a firearm to pick a side. Mathematicians have been peacefully arguing this for centuries, but clearly Gru's patience has run out. Is math inherent to the universe, waiting to be discovered like some cosmic treasure map? Or is it just a clever human invention, like pants or reality TV? Choose wisely—your answer might determine whether you end up as a minion or not.