Held Together With Negative Vspace And Duct Tape

The eternal struggle of every engineering graduate! You've mastered fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and can build a bridge that won't collapse... but throw a basic integral at you and suddenly your brain short-circuits faster than an overloaded capacitor! 🧮💥 It's that special moment when your fancy degree means you can design a rocket but you're still defeated by the same calculus that terrorized you in freshman year. Engineers in the wild: can calculate stress tensors for complex materials but will hiss like a frightened cat when asked to integrate by parts!

The internet's finest historical accuracy on display! Fermi won his Nobel Prize in 1938, but the article claims he published his groundbreaking work on March 25, 1938... which would be the fastest peer review and Nobel selection in history. Science typically moves at the pace of a tenured professor approaching retirement, not same-day Amazon delivery. Truth is, Fermi received his Nobel for work published years earlier, and he actually got the news while fleeing fascist Italy. Nothing says "congratulations on your scientific achievement" quite like escaping a dictatorship with your Nobel medal as emergency currency.

The meme brilliantly captures the historical struggle of women scientists like Chien-Shiung Wu, who performed the crucial experiment disproving the conservation of parity but watched two male colleagues win the Nobel Prize for the theory instead. That wide-eyed, shocked Squidward face is basically every female scientist throughout history watching their work get Columbus'd by male colleagues. Wu's experiment literally changed our understanding of physics, yet she got the scientific equivalent of "thanks for the help, sweetie." The scientific community's history of overlooking women's contributions is so consistent it could qualify as its own natural law—Newton's Fourth Law: Female Achievement Tends to Remain Uncredited Unless Acted Upon by Massive Public Outrage.

The eternal struggle of scientific research! Someone innocently searches for "sonic choking" (a legitimate fluid dynamics concept where flow reaches the speed of sound), only to be bombarded with... um... cartoon hedgehog content of questionable nature. 😂 This is the perfect illustration of why scientists need specific terminology in search queries. "Sonic choking fluid dynamics" saves the day! Pro tip: Always add your field name to avoid the weird corners of the internet during research. The internet never fails to remind us it's a wild place, even when you're just trying to study supersonic flow!

It's the scientific food chain in action! Each field thinks it's the top dog while getting threatened by the next level of reductionism. Biology smugly sits there until Chemistry shows up with a gun saying "you're just applied chemistry." Then Physics crashes the party threatening Chemistry as "just applied physics." But wait! The final boss appears from the shadows - Mathematics - ready to reduce Physics to mere equations! The eternal academic turf war continues... and somewhere a philosopher is loading a bazooka labeled "but what even IS mathematics?"

Behold! The forbidden mathematical transitive property that proves "Facts = y"! This masterpiece of logical gymnastics transforms serious scientific facts into the variable "y" through a series of increasingly questionable substitutions. Starting with "Facts → fax" (because who needs accuracy when you have outdated technology?), then magically turning "fax → fx" (dropping vowels like they're hot), before finally reaching "f(x) → y" (as any calculus survivor knows). It's basically the mathematical equivalent of that game where you whisper a message around a circle and end up with something completely unrelated. Next week: proving chocolate is a vegetable using similar rigorous methods!