The Crocodile Inequality Of Love

This textbook is basically saying "when your number is so massive it's stopped caring about small-time additions." Avogadro's number (10 23 ) is so ridiculously huge that adding 23 to it is like throwing a grain of sand into the Grand Canyon and expecting the tour guide to update the brochure. And then there's the "very large numbers" that are so astronomically gigantic they don't even notice when you multiply them by mere billions upon billions. It's the numerical equivalent of a celebrity too famous to acknowledge your existence. These numbers have transcended mathematical anxiety - they're just out there living their best life, completely unbothered by our operations. The footnote about "keeping track of leftover factors" is the textbook equivalent of a nervous laugh after making a dad joke at a faculty meeting.

Einstein's famous equation E=MC² just got a hilarious makeover for the perpetually pessimistic physicist! The meme dissects every possible negative interpretation of the symbols in the equation - from "vertical minus" to "diagonal minus" to even "squared (makes it extra negative)." The punchline about AI having "potential to impact the future" is that perfect blend of scientific anxiety and dark humor that only STEM folks truly appreciate. It's like someone took the most revolutionary equation in physics and turned it into a diagram for their emotional state during finals week!

Four years of engineering education culminates in the profound diagnosis: "The engine is made out of engine." The gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application has never been so beautifully illustrated. Knowing the Carnot cycle doesn't help when your dad expects you to figure out why the car is making that weird noise. In the lab, we call this the "academic-to-reality conversion efficiency" - typically hovering around 0.001%.

Two cars pull up to impress the same person. The white compact is plastered with mathematical equations - a noble attempt at intellectual signaling. The red sports car? Just basic physics diagrams. Perfectly captures the eternal academic hierarchy. Mathematicians build elegant theoretical frameworks while physicists take the simplified versions and get all the funding, publications, and apparently, the romantic attention. As we say in the lab: "Math is respected, but physics gets the grant money." And apparently the dates.

That textbook just casually dropped the bombshell that electrons have feelings! The highlighted line states "an electron never kills itself or other electrons because of love" — implying these subatomic particles have emotional lives and relationship drama? No wonder Obi-Wan looks utterly baffled! What's next? Quarks with commitment issues? Neutrons with narcissistic tendencies? This is what happens when physicists pull all-nighters before submitting their manuscript. Someone needs to tell these electrons that repelling each other isn't "playing hard to get" — it's just the electromagnetic force doing its thing!

They had one job . Someone designed a shirt showing how physicists see biology—just label every part of a cow as "cow"—but then completely missed the punchline by using an actual anatomically correct cow diagram! The joke is supposed to be that physicists oversimplify biological systems into idealized spherical objects, not that they're too detailed. This is like bringing calculus to a kindergarten counting contest. Whoever approved this design clearly failed both Physics 101 and Comedy 101. This missed opportunity hurts my academic soul more than faculty budget meetings.