Physics Without Newton

The physics here is absolutely magnificent ! A shrunken moon would still maintain its original mass (conservation of mass, folks!) but with drastically reduced volume. This creates an object with density comparable to a neutron star! Throwing this ultra-dense mini-moon would create an impact equivalent to millions of nuclear bombs. The atmospheric entry? That's where it gets spicy! The mini-moon would generate so much friction it would create a plasma sheath hot enough to ionize air molecules. But unlike typical meteors, its extreme density means it wouldn't lose much mass during entry. Earth would essentially get punched by a cosmic bowling ball with the mass of our actual moon. So would it burn up? Not even close. We'd be looking at an extinction-level event that makes dinosaurs feel lucky. Gru's villainous plan is basically "advanced planetary destruction with extra steps."

Newton's First Law of Dating! Someone brilliantly applied physics to explain why the romantically active keep bouncing from partner to partner while singles remain... well, stationary. 🧪💔 The "Fisiks" meme format perfectly captures that mind-blown moment when you realize Sir Isaac Newton wasn't just talking about physical objects—he was secretly dropping relationship advice all along! That external force? Probably someone sliding into your DMs with a "hey" at 2 AM. 🔬 Next time you're wondering why you're still single, remember: you're not lonely, you're just obeying the fundamental laws of physics! Time to find that external force... or become one yourself!

The ultimate scientific flex! This Venn diagram perfectly captures the academic food chain where physicists reign supreme. According to this diagram, physicists can mock engineers, get paid well, AND be better than chemists—the STEM field trifecta! Meanwhile, mathematicians are stuck just mocking engineers, engineers can't win Nobel Prizes, and chemists... well, they're apparently everyone's punching bag. The center suggests that the ultimate achievement in science is being better than chemists. Whoever made this was definitely a physicist with an axe to grind and a superiority complex the size of a supermassive black hole. The interdepartmental shade is strong with this one!

The stakes of saying "oops" escalate dramatically depending on your profession! A teacher's "oops" might mean a typo on the board. A surgeon's "oops" could mean someone wakes up with one kidney instead of two. But a nuclear physicist's "oops"? That's when you check if your city still exists on Google Maps. The difference between "I accidentally taught the wrong formula" and "I accidentally created a small sun where downtown used to be" is... substantial. Chernobyl wasn't a disaster—it was just a really big "oops" moment!

The devil's parenting standards are surprisingly strict when it comes to ancient weaponry. Archimedes, the OG mad scientist, allegedly created a death ray by positioning mirrors to focus sunlight onto enemy ships, setting them ablaze from a distance. The physics actually checks out—concentrated solar energy can indeed create enough heat to start fires. Modern attempts to recreate this have had mixed results, suggesting Archimedes might have been history's first "trust me bro" scientist. Still, gotta admire a man who looked at the sun and thought "hmm, how can I weaponize that?"

The top image shows students laughing hysterically claiming "THE PHYSICS TEST IS GOING GREAT" while the bottom shows the thousand-yard stare of a shell-shocked soldier with "V > C" underneath. For the uninitiated, that's velocity greater than the speed of light—a physical impossibility according to Einstein's relativity. It's that special moment when you're so deep in exam despair that breaking the fundamental laws of physics seems like a reasonable answer. Nothing says "I've given up" quite like casually violating causality on question 3b.