How I Draw The Ξ (Xi)

Newton's first law of motion basically says objects stay put unless something pushes them. Revolutionary? Not really. It's like "discovering" that water is wet or that pizza tastes good! Picture Newton having this MIND-BLOWING epiphany and just standing there with his arms outstretched like he's the messiah of the obvious. "EUREKA! If I don't touch it... IT DOESN'T MOVE!" *gasp* Someone give this man a medal for noticing what literally every rock has been doing since the beginning of time! 🤯

Einstein would be proud of this creative application of relativity! When geometrical optics gets too boring, students find their own way to bend space-time—by turning Einstein's portrait into their personal stick figure playground. Notice how the genius's head perfectly completes the doodle? That's not laziness, that's efficiency . Thirty minutes into a lecture about optical filters, and suddenly your notebook becomes the only place where physics is actually interesting. The real photoelectric effect is how quickly students' attention gets ejected from the lesson.

Running away from physics problems faster than Billy's super-powered apple! For context: 13,000 terajoules is roughly the energy of a small nuclear bomb. That apple would literally vaporize Billy, the classroom, and probably the entire campus! Physics textbook problems exist in their own bizarre universe where watermelons weigh 70kg and trains travel at relativistic speeds. No wonder you're making memes instead of studying—it's the only sane response to these ridiculous scenarios!

The eternal battle between mathematicians and physicists continues! While mathematicians clutch their pearls over mathematical purity, physicists are out here treating derivatives like fractions and canceling them willy-nilly! The horror! In the rigorous world of math, d/dx is a differential operator that follows specific rules. But walk into a physics classroom and you'll see d's flying around, getting canceled, and multiplied like they're having a wild party! Non-standard analysis? Who has time for that when there's a universe to figure out? Physicists be like: "Does it work? Great! Moving on to the next unsolved mystery of the cosmos!"

Every biochem and physics student knows that pain. Top image shows the Krebs cycle (aka citric acid cycle) with its maddening array of enzymes and intermediates that powers cellular respiration. Bottom shows the Carnot cycle, that thermodynamic nightmare with isothermal and adiabatic processes that engineering students memorize while crying into their coffee. The monkey's expression perfectly captures that moment when your professor says "this will definitely be on the exam" and your brain just shuts down. The "neuron activation" part is the brief moment of clarity before realizing you still don't understand either cycle. Fun fact: The Krebs cycle produces just 2 ATP molecules directly but sets up the electron transport chain to make about 34 more. That's efficiency that would make even a thermodynamics professor proud!

The nuclear energy supporter is having NONE of that renewable energy slander! First panel: our nuclear enthusiast is defending wind and solar from lies. Second panel: some cartoon dude shows up screaming about nuclear being scary. Third panel: *SPLAT* 💥 This is basically every energy policy debate on Twitter compressed into three panels. The irony? Nuclear power has one of the lowest death rates per terawatt-hour of any energy source - even lower than solar and wind! But try explaining that at Thanksgiving dinner without someone having a meltdown. Pun absolutely intended.