Who Would Vote Against This?

The red circle highlights all the trigonometry and logarithm buttons that haunted our math classes! For most people, these functions might as well be decorative stickers. We spent weeks learning SOH-CAH-TOA only to graduate and never compute a single tangent again. Meanwhile, the humble addition and multiplication buttons are doing 99% of the heavy lifting in our daily calculations. Those sin, cos, and tan buttons are basically the appendix of the calculator world – technically they serve a purpose, but most of us are living just fine without ever using them!

Ever notice how professors lose their minds when you cite Wikipedia or ChatGPT, but absolutely swoon over Ramanujan's "it came to me in a dream" mathematical proofs? 🌸 The legendary mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan literally claimed the goddess Namagiri whispered equations to him while he slept, and academia was like "Seems legit!" Meanwhile, your meticulously researched Wikipedia citation gets you banished to the shadow realm of academic integrity violations. Double standards much? Next time just tell your professor that ChatGPT is your personal dream deity. Worth a shot!

When words fail, violence prevails. Nothing says "I've exhausted all mathematical approaches" quite like drawing a samurai committing seppuku at the end of your proof. The ancient Japanese tradition of ritual suicide: now available as a mathematical proof technique when you've hit a dead end with those pesky fractions. Some mathematicians use QED, others prefer the elegant "therefore" symbol, but true warriors know that ritualistic self-disembowelment really drives home that final conclusion. Next time your professor questions your proof methods, just remember - honor before partial derivatives.

The eternal struggle of math nerds everywhere! On the left, we've got "Fitting into society" with the angles π, π/2, and π/4 in radians. On the right, "Being happy" with the same angles in degrees (180°, 90°, 45°). It's basically saying that people who prefer radians over degrees are doomed to be social outcasts! The true mark of a math enthusiast is measuring your social awkwardness in π units instead of normal human numbers. Next time someone asks you to make a right turn, just yell "π/2 RADIANS!" and watch your friend list shrink faster than a polynomial convergence!

The beautiful trap of formal logic strikes again! While normal folks hear an absurd hypothetical and react with confusion, logicians are smugly nodding because the statement is technically true. Since unicorns don't exist (sorry, fantasy fans), the condition "when all unicorns learn to fly" can never be satisfied. In formal logic, this makes the entire "if-then" statement true by default—what logicians call a "vacuous truth." It's like promising to give everyone a million dollars if the sun turns into chocolate pudding. Technically, I haven't lied! The whole field of mathematics is built on these pedantic technicalities, and some of us are way too proud of understanding them.

The eternal math debate that drives calculus professors to drink! The derivative notation df/dx technically isn't a fraction... except when it absolutely behaves like one. Just try chain rule without treating it like a fraction - good luck! It's the mathematical equivalent of "I'm not angry" while slamming doors. Mathematicians will fight you on this while simultaneously canceling those ds like nobody's business. Pure mathematicians in the corner having existential crises while engineers just keep dividing those differentials without a care in the world.