Who Runs The World? Mathematics!

Boolean logic, but make it spooky. The creator has brilliantly illustrated logic gates using jack-o'-lantern Venn diagrams. The OR gate shows features in either circle, AND shows only what's in the overlap, XOR displays what's in either but not both, NOR shows nothing at all, NAND displays everything except the overlap, and XNOR shows only what's identical in both circles. Computer scientists don't get invited to many Halloween parties, and now we know why they spend their time making pumpkin logic diagrams instead.

That moment when you think you've mastered the quadratic formula only to discover the cubic formula exists! 😱 The quadratic formula is like the friendly neighborhood math tool we all remember, but the cubic formula? That's the final boss nobody warned you about! It's like going from "I can cook pasta" to suddenly facing a 12-course French cuisine recipe. Math really said "You thought THIS was hard? Hold my calculator!" 🤣

Ever notice how physicists can't resist overcomplicating everything ? The left shooter is calculating Newton's Third Law with centrifugal and Coriolis forces while the right one is applying the Euler-Lagrange equation... all to hit a target! 😂 It's the perfect metaphor for science itself - we can either make things unnecessarily complex or just... aim and shoot. Sometimes the simplest approach works best, but where's the fun in that? This is why engineers and physicists never finish projects on time!

Someone needs to send this guy back to geometry class! A 360-degree difference means you've gone full circle and ended up exactly where you started. It's like saying "I took a completely different route home" but actually just drove around the block and parked in the same spot. The mathematical irony here is delicious. In angular measurement, 360° represents a complete rotation that brings you back to the original position. So technically, he's saying the two are identical! The Prime Minister probably meant "180 degrees different" (completely opposite), but instead accidentally created the perfect mathematical self-own.

The mathematical universe has a twisted sense of humor. First, we get the Pythagorean Theorem (3² + 4² = 5²), which actually works. Then someone notices 3³ + 4³ + 5³ = 6³, and we think, "Hmm, interesting pattern forming here..." Then comes the ultimate troll: 3⁴ + 4⁴ + 5⁴ + 6⁴ = 7⁴? Nope! That's just mathematicians giving you false hope before crushing your pattern-seeking soul. This is why mathematicians drink coffee—reality is disappointing enough without being fully awake for it.

The statistical distribution of understanding basic logic is painfully accurate! At both extremes of the IQ bell curve, people are like "IDK if A or not A is true" while the middle-brain folks confidently assert "A or not A is true for all A." This is literally the law of excluded middle in logic—something MUST be either true or false! It's the perfect representation of horseshoe theory in intelligence—where the super low and super high IQ people somehow reach the same confused conclusion while the average person gets it right. Those 68% in the middle smugly understanding basic Boolean logic while the outliers are questioning reality itself!