The Math In The Paper Is Honestly Pretty Cool

This triangle is the stuff of mathematical nightmares! Someone labeled the sides of a right triangle with complex numbers: the base is 0 (from -1 to 1), the height is i, and the hypotenuses are both 0. It's Pythagoras rolling in his grave! The triangle that breaks reality itself—where 0² + i² = 0². Math teachers everywhere just felt a disturbance in the force. This is what happens when you let imaginary numbers crash the geometry party!

Behold, the chaotic evil of data visualization. What you're witnessing is the mathematical equivalent of putting pineapple on pizza—technically permissible but morally questionable. Misaligned log scales are the kind of thing that would make your statistics professor develop a twitch. Sure, there's no explicit rule against it, just like there's no explicit rule against using Comic Sans in your dissertation... but some crimes against humanity don't need to be codified to be wrong.

When mathematicians spot asterisks (*) instead of proper multiplication dots (·) or the cross symbol (×) in an equation, it's like finding a typo in the Constitution. The tweet shows a statistical formula from a government document where they've committed this cardinal sin of notation. In programming languages like Python, the asterisk makes perfect sense for multiplication, but in formal mathematical notation? That's basically announcing "I haven't opened a math textbook since middle school." The formula itself is trying to look sophisticated, but the notation is screaming amateur hour. It's like wearing a lab coat with the price tag still attached.

Statistical distributions have ABANDONED SHIP! This poll shows the ultimate statistical rebellion - a bimodal distribution masquerading as a normal curve! The highest numbers are at B (45) and "don't drive/results" (50), creating twin peaks that would make any statistician twitch uncontrollably. It's like the data is saying "I refuse to be normally distributed, MUHAHAHA!" The cherry on top? The person chose C (average) despite being part of this mathematical mutiny! Self-assessment bias in its natural habitat - we're all just average drivers in a world where half the respondents don't even drive! 🧪📊

Four years of quantum mechanics and advanced calculus, and what do you get? A physics degree that does zero work. The meme brilliantly illustrates the classic physics equation W = F·d·cos(θ), where if displacement (d) equals zero or the angle is 90°, the work done is precisely... nothing. Just like your career prospects! From graduation cap to McDonald's cap with a brief stint throwing your degree in the trash—at least the math checks out. Turns out understanding the fundamental forces of the universe doesn't force employers to hire you.

The mathematical rebel we didn't know we needed! This is basically the calculus equivalent of taking the fire escape instead of the elevator. Integration by parts requires you to remember that whole u·dv = uv - ∫v·du formula and sometimes feels like you're just creating more problems for yourself. Meanwhile, substitution is like "new variable, who dis?" — just swap things out and cruise to the finish line. It's the mathematical equivalent of saying "I know there's a proper technique here, but I'm going to parkour my way through this problem because I refuse to follow your arbitrary integration rules!"