Proof Of The Jordan Curve Theorem

The duality of scientific stereotypes on full display! 🧪💣 When a clean-cut physicist says "I made a bomb," everyone's like "Aww, what a genius!" (Think Oppenheimer vibes but with compliments). But when a scruffy mathematician announces the same achievement? INSTANT PANIC BUTTON! This perfectly captures academia's unspoken dress code hierarchy. Come in looking like you've been solving equations in a cabin for 7 years, and suddenly your "bomb" doesn't sound like a breakthrough in theoretical mathematics anymore! The real lesson? If you're going to revolutionize science, maybe shave first. Your HR department will thank you!

The eternal rivalry between mathematicians and physicists exposed! The meme shows a Taylor expansion formula where only the first two terms are labeled "Actual Taylor expansion" while the rest are crossed out as "Lies invented by mathematicians to feel superior to physicists." This is basically every physics course in a nutshell. Physicists are notorious for their "good enough" approximations—why use the full infinite series when the first two terms get you within 99% accuracy? Meanwhile, mathematicians are clutching their pearls at such blasphemy. The truth is, most physical systems don't need those higher-order terms unless you're calculating the orbit of Mercury or something equally pretentious. Engineers take it even further and just round π to 3. Pure savagery.

Engineering students living in their own dimension where casual conversation is replaced by Navier-Stokes equations. The meme brilliantly captures that moment when someone asks a fluid dynamics enthusiast "how's it going?" and their brain immediately floods with partial differential equations instead of normal human responses. The Navier-Stokes equations shown are the holy grail of fluid dynamics - describing how the velocity, pressure, density and viscosity of a moving fluid are related. They're notoriously complex (one of the Millennium Prize Problems offers $1 million for solving them!), yet to engineering students, they're just casual chitchat material. That final "yea" panel is engineering humor at its finest - as if these incomprehensible equations are just a normal way to respond to "how's it going?" The title "Who Up Stoking They Navier Rn?" perfectly parodies late-night social media posts with "who up?" but for people who stay up late solving fluid dynamics problems instead.

Calculating romantic probability has never been so mathematically rigorous! This is Bayes' Theorem applied to the eternal question: "Does she like me?" The formula brilliantly quantifies the probability that someone likes you given they smiled at you, by factoring in how often they smile at people they like versus how often they just smile generally. Unfortunately, most nerds who understand this formula perfectly still round their final answer to "probably just being friendly." The irony is that understanding conditional probability doesn't guarantee success in the probability space of dating.

Oh, sweet mathematical optimism! The top equation represents 2020 as a simple integral of 1/x⁵, which is already pretty terrible since it approaches infinity as x approaches zero. But 2021? That's the same nightmare with "+1" in the denominator—a pathetic attempt to make the function marginally less catastrophic. It's like thinking a life preserver will help when you're being sucked into a black hole. Spoiler alert: when your disaster is measured in powers of x⁵, adding 1 is just mathematical thoughts and prayers.

The mathematical mic drop moment we all needed! SpongeBob is dropping prime number facts that would make Euclid spit out his coffee. This is peak number theory humor because both statements are hilariously true yet sound completely contradictory. The number 2 stands alone as the only even prime (since all other even numbers are divisible by 2), while 3 is indeed the only prime divisible by 3 (because... well, that's how division works). It's the mathematical equivalent of saying "I'm the only person in the world named after me." Technically correct—the best kind of correct!