Proof By Non Credible Diplomacy

Whoever created this deserves a Nobel Prize in Nerd Humor! These Venn diagrams brilliantly illustrate logical operators using Halloween's "Trick or Treat" tradition. Each diagram shows exactly how Boolean logic gates work: OR: You get either trick OR treat OR both (union of sets) AND: You only get what's in both circles (intersection) XOR: You get either trick OR treat but NOT both (exclusive OR) NOR: You get nothing! (negation of OR) NAND: Everything except what's in both circles (negation of AND) XNOR: You get both OR neither (negation of XOR) The pumpkin faces perfectly match each operation's result. This is what happens when computer scientists go trick-or-treating!

What you're looking at is the mathematical equivalent of pure evil - seven identical sine waves plotting their sinister oscillations across the coordinate plane. Get it? Seven waves... Seven Deadly Sins! This is peak math humor that would make even Pythagoras snort coffee through his nose. The real sin here is how satisfying these perfectly spaced waves look while simultaneously giving calculus students nightmares about having to integrate them. Just imagine your professor saying "find the area under these curves" and watching your soul leave your body.

The ultimate mathematical detection system! While traditional geometrists rely on protractors and rulers, this genius has discovered a far more... personal method of square identification. Clearly the shape shown is a phallic diagram rather than an actual square, but the commenter's erectile dysfunction when viewing non-square shapes serves as irrefutable proof. Move over, Euclidean geometry—we've entered the era of anatomical verification where "if it doesn't raise the flag, it ain't a square." Mathematics has never been so... stimulating.

The eternal rivalry between mathematicians and physicists exposed! The meme shows a Taylor expansion formula where only the first two terms are labeled "Actual Taylor expansion" while the rest are crossed out as "Lies invented by mathematicians to feel superior to physicists." This is basically every physics course in a nutshell. Physicists are notorious for their "good enough" approximations—why use the full infinite series when the first two terms get you within 99% accuracy? Meanwhile, mathematicians are clutching their pearls at such blasphemy. The truth is, most physical systems don't need those higher-order terms unless you're calculating the orbit of Mercury or something equally pretentious. Engineers take it even further and just round π to 3. Pure savagery.

The desperation is palpable! Physics students know that Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics isn't just a textbook—it's a mathematical gauntlet that has broken spirits since 1962. The joke brilliantly flips the typical "checkmate atheists" format by suggesting that only divine intervention could help someone understand Maxwell's equations and vector calculus the night before an exam. Trust me, no amount of cramming will save you from Jackson's infamous problem sets. Even Einstein would need more than one night!

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory asking "How Many Decimals of Pi Do We Really Need?" is like waving a red flag at a mathematician. Engineers at NASA only use about 15 digits of pi for their most precise interplanetary calculations, but mathematicians? They want every single digit like they're collecting infinity stones. The beautiful irony is that rocket scientists—who literally send things to Mars—are practical enough to know when to stop, while theoretical mathematicians are screaming for more digits of a number that never ends. It's the perfect representation of the theory vs. application divide in science. One group asks "is it enough?" while the other shrieks "BUT THERE'S MORE!"