Newton's Social Media Guilt Trip

This flowchart is what happens when career counselors have a mental breakdown. Engineering? Only if you're "good with things." Chemistry? Congratulations on your future as a "fussy pedant." And let's not forget Computer Science, perfect for those who prefer "slow, indirect evil" over the more efficient varieties. The beautiful part is how it nails the existential crisis of every STEM student. "Why do you want to major in a STEM field?" Options include "curiosity" (adorable), "to save the planet" (delusional), or my personal favorite, the dawning realization that STEM was supposed to involve actual plants for Biology majors. After 30 years of teaching, I can confirm this is approximately 87% accurate. The missing 13% is the path where you choose your major based on which department has the least uncomfortable chairs in the lecture hall.

The eternal truth of scientific textbook lifespans! Physics books become doorstops after a few paradigm shifts (sorry Newton), and chemistry texts turn into historical fiction once we discover new elements or particles. But mathematics? Those ancient theorems from thousands of years ago still crush it in modern classrooms. Pythagoras would totally high-five a calculus student today. The Pythagorean theorem hasn't needed a software update since 500 BCE, while physics and chemistry are basically subscription services with mandatory upgrades. Mathematical truth is the cockroach of academia - utterly indestructible!

The eternal math student nightmare! Instead of blindly memorizing Maxwell-Faraday's equations (MFs), you're supposed to understand and derive them. But then you discover the proof involves complex vector calculus that's "nonexaminable" – meaning you won't be tested on it, but you still need the result. It's that perfect academic trap where professors say "just trust me" while expecting you to show all your work. The mathematical equivalent of "source: dude, trust me."

The formula looks like someone sneezed on their calculator, yet somehow it's mathematically correct. Ramanujan just casually derived this pi formula while other mathematicians were still struggling with basic fractions. The reply asking "name one thing this country gave to the world" with India's flag is the mathematical equivalent of dropping the mic. Like, oh I don't know, just one of the most brilliant mathematical minds who derived complex formulas through intuition while the rest of us need three attempts to calculate a restaurant tip.

When your woodworking teacher asks for a simple cube but you build a Necker cube instead. Congratulations, you've created an impossible object that exists only as a visual paradox! The human brain tries desperately to interpret this as a 3D object while it's actually a 2D representation that can't physically exist. No wonder you're banned from 3D spaces—you're breaking the laws of spatial reality faster than a quantum particle ignores the speed limit. Next time maybe just use a regular block of wood instead of casually warping perception?

The quiz question makes perfect sense, unlike the title which is asking for the 5th digit of π in the Fibonacci sequence—a mathematical crime that would make Euler roll in his grave. At least YouTube's algorithm got something right by asking about the golden ratio (1.618), which is actually related to the Fibonacci sequence. It's like asking "What's the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?" and expecting the answer to be "mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell." Mathematical nonsense like this is why mathematicians develop eye twitches by age 30.