I Mean Desmos Says √X=±√X

Physics and engineering students looking at someone calling scientific calculator functions "useless"? *nervous laughter intensifies* 🧪 Those circled buttons (sin, cos, tan, log) are the bread and butter of anyone who's ever had to calculate the trajectory of a projectile at 2AM while questioning their life choices! Without them, we'd still be drawing triangles in the sand like cavemen with protractors! The real useless button is the one that turns the calculator on. Once you enter STEM, that thing never gets turned off. It becomes a permanent extension of your trembling, caffeine-fueled hand!

Welcome to the corporate dystopia of "smart cities" planning! Two team members immediately jump to surveillance-based solutions—one suggesting "Minority Report" pre-crime AI (because nothing says urban planning like arresting people before they drive badly), and another brilliantly proposing "1984" surveillance (because traffic congestion is definitely solved by Big Brother watching you). Meanwhile, the quiet engineer in the corner suggests actual math and science: graph theory to optimize the street grid into a more efficient tree structure while adapting speed limits. Naturally, this person gets thrown out the window. Can't have actual solutions interfering with our dystopian surveillance fantasies! Fun fact: Graph theory has been used to solve real traffic problems since the 1950s, but why use proven mathematics when you can just slap "AI" on a proposal and get triple the funding?

The mathematical equation sin x = x is the secret handshake of engineering students everywhere! This approximation is only valid for small angles, but engineers embrace it like a religious doctrine. While mathematicians would scream in horror at such blasphemy, engineers are celebrating finding one of their own who understands the beautiful art of "close enough." The bottom panel perfectly captures that tribal recognition moment—you know, when you meet someone who also thinks π = 3 when the deadline is tight. Engineering: where precision is negotiable but graduation is mandatory.

Classical physicists: "We need exact solutions!" Meanwhile, Richard Feynman's just sitting there like "What if we just... draw some squiggly lines?" The beauty of Feynman diagrams is that they turned horrifyingly complex quantum field theory integrals into cute little pictures that even undergrads can understand (sort of). While traditional mathematicians were having existential crises over unsolvable equations, Feynman was like "hold my bongo drums" and revolutionized physics with doodles. The Nobel committee basically gave him a prize for being the ultimate physics hack artist. And that angry guy in the third panel? That's every mathematician who spent years deriving exact solutions only to be upstaged by some feather diagrams and perturbation theory.

The integral symbol (∫) has been tormenting calculus students since 1675. Some poor soul's partner claimed they could calculate the area under a curve, but their "method" is just counting squares like we're back in elementary school. The comment suggesting to use MS Paint and check file size is peak desperate mathematician energy. When your relationship is being destroyed by Riemann sums.

Behold! The mathematical equivalent of saying "it is what it is"! This genius "new formula" is just π written as π/Π×π, which equals π because fractions cancel out. It's like discovering that water is wet and then framing the certificate. Mathematicians everywhere are either crying or slow-clapping at this circular reasoning that goes absolutely nowhere—much like trying to calculate the exact digits of π itself! The ultimate mathematical tautology that proves nothing except someone's dad-joke level is over 9000!