The Deadliest Moisturizer In Science

The eternal truth of mathematical principles! While physics textbooks become doorstops after Newton changed the game, and chemistry books turn obsolete once we discovered those pesky electrons, math books from ancient Babylon could still help you ace your calculus final. The Pythagorean theorem hasn't gotten any software updates since 500 BCE, and Euclid's Elements is still torturing high schoolers 2,300 years later. Meanwhile, physicists and chemists are frantically rewriting their textbooks every time someone discovers a new particle or element. Mathematical truths are eternal—which explains why your professor's lecture notes look like they were carbon-dated from the Mesozoic era.

Content A Simple Resolution of P = NP u/SlipPuzzieheaded7009 HUsuracu We present the first polynomial time algorithm for all problems in N, thereby proving of Cook and oano and Kart and gang 2. our method extends Valiant and gang's algebraic enumeration techniques 3 and 7 (1014 introduction The P vs NP problem- in Cook's 1971 theorem-provino work 1 and Karo's 1972 compilations of IF-complete problems 2 asks whether every problem whose solution can be verified in (n" time can also be solved in O(n) time We prove P = NP by devising a polv time solver that swn thesises circuit constructions a la vallant and gang.3 with certicate guided branching methods (Papadimitriou and gang 4). Our proof is rigorous and breathtakinglv concise mv wite's bovtriend told me so 5) Preliminaries All prior efforts are trivial and naive. Cook-Levin's reduction I is fine: SAI solvers are cute party tricks: POP theorems 6 are delightful and humorous. None saw the obvious that we have. Vain 'Theorem P= NP Proof Left as an exercise for the reader Results and Discussion SAT. CLIOUE. and Hamiltonian Cycle solved in O(n?) time Acknowledgments Tacknowledse. on bebslf of the entire mathematies community. the unparglleled senius of ruself Reterences . A. "The Complexitv of Theorem-Proving Procedures." STOC '71. ACM. 1971 2. Karp. R. M. "Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems." in Complexity of Computer Valiant, L. G. "The Complexity of Enumeration and Reliability Problems." SIAM J. Comput. vol. 8. no. 3, pp. 410-421. 1979. :contentReference oaicite:2 index=2 4. Papadimitrion. C. H.. et al. *On the Complexity of Local Search in Combinatorial Optimize 6. Arora. S.. Safra. S. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP"

Nuclear escalation at its finest! Two women fighting over a stolen atom leads to King Solomon-style judgment: "Split it in half." Unfortunately, with U-235 (the uranium isotope used in nuclear weapons), splitting atoms triggers nuclear fission, releasing massive energy and creating that iconic mushroom cloud. Talk about taking "splitting the difference" way too literally! Next time someone suggests dividing an atom to resolve a dispute, maybe consider therapy instead of thermonuclear detonation.

Remember when colorful solutions were just "pretty magic water" and not "coordination compounds with d-orbital splitting that'll destroy your GPA"? Those were simpler times. Now you're hunched over lab reports at 3 AM, questioning your life choices because some transition metal decided to form five different complexes with varying geometries. The jump from "ooh, shiny colors" to "calculate the crystal field stabilization energy" is the academic equivalent of stepping on a LEGO in the dark.

When your cell biology knowledge gets you blocked on social media. Phospholipids have a hydrophilic (water-loving) head and two hydrophobic (water-fearing) tails - essentially making them look like a sphere on top with two dangly bits below. It's probably the most scientifically precise body-shape insult in existence. The structural accuracy makes it impossible to argue against. Can't fault someone for understanding molecular biology too well.

The perfect linguistic pH joke doesn't exi— Oh wait, there it is! Someone brilliantly connected Spanish phonetics with chemistry by asking "If they don't use pH how do they tell acids from bases?" Pure genius! The punchline works because Spanish doesn't use the "ph" digraph in spelling (replacing it with "f"), while in chemistry, pH is the scale that measures how acidic or basic a solution is. It's a spectacular collision of etymology and titration that would make both linguists and chemists snort their coffee through their nose filters.