Can't Wait To Have McDonald's On Mars

The greatest cosmic hide-and-seek game ever! Dark matter is literally everywhere around us, making up most of our universe, yet completely invisible and undetectable by normal means. Scientists can only tell it exists because galaxies spin too fast without flying apart—like a merry-go-round spinning at 100mph while the horses stay attached by magic! The Tom face says it all: "I can explain gravitational lensing and cosmic microwave background radiation, but when you ask me to just POINT AT IT... well... *gestures vaguely at everything*"

The eternal cosmic mystery meeting: someone points out we can't account for most of the universe's mass, and three physicists immediately propose wildly different solutions. One suggests "just call it dark matter" (the scientific equivalent of labeling a folder "misc stuff" and shoving it in a drawer). Another jumps to multiverse theory faster than you can say "grant proposal." The third suggests maybe—just maybe—we should check our math first. The boss's reaction is every PI who's watched their theoretical physics meeting devolve into existential screaming. That window-throwing energy is what happens after the 47th time someone says "but what if spacetime is actually..."

When your equation doesn't match reality, just invent an invisible force to fix it! Physicists have been pulling this trick for centuries - from "dark matter" to "dark energy" to whatever else is hiding in the cosmic couch cushions! The best part? It actually works! Your calculations are wrong? No problem! Just slap a mysterious "dark number" into your equation and *poof* - suddenly you're not wrong, you're a VISIONARY! Next up: explaining why my bank account is negative using "dark money" theory. My financial advisor is gonna LOVE this approach!

The cognitive dissonance is strong with this one. Water (H 2 O) has exactly TWO hydrogen atoms, while our solar system has exactly ONE star. Someone failed both chemistry and astronomy in spectacular fashion. The stick figure's journey from "wait, that can't be right" to "oh, I see the problem" is basically the scientific method in its most primal form - minus the peer review where your colleagues mercilessly mock your counting abilities. Next up: discovering there are more electrons in a grain of sand than there are grains of sand on Earth. (Spoiler: also wrong.)

Someone clearly failed Astronomy 101. That's the moon with a horizontal line across it, not a solar eclipse. The irony is exquisite - calling a full moon a solar eclipse while inadvertently creating the perfect visual metaphor for how flat Earth believers see reality: with an artificial line through it. Nature's own peer review of pseudoscience.

Ever notice how the smartest people in the room are the ones convinced they'd time travel due to Earth's motion, while the rest of us are just vibing in our inertial reference frames? This meme brilliantly skewers how intelligence follows a bell curve when it comes to understanding relativity. The cosmic joke here is that both the lowest and highest IQ folks reach the same conclusion (you stay in the same place) but for entirely different reasons. The average-brained middle thinks they're geniuses for believing Earth's movement would launch them through time—completely missing Einstein's point that all motion is relative . In relativity, there's no absolute reference frame, so you can't "time travel into space" just because Earth moves. The truly galaxy-brained understand this, and the blissfully ignorant accidentally get it right. Meanwhile, the 100 IQ crowd is sweating profusely while explaining their time travel theories at parties.