The Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Gap

The irony is delicious! A textbook page on "Real Analysis" with a missing variable definition (that blank space where "T" should be) is supposedly AI-generated. This is peak mathematical humor—AI still struggles with consistent variable naming and proper mathematical notation. The proof has the formal structure but falls apart with this glaring omission. It's like watching a robot try to dance ballet while missing a leg. Next time someone claims "AI will replace mathematicians," just point to this proof where even the completeness property of ℝ couldn't complete the variable definitions!

That graph is what happens when AI learns to code itself! Look at that cliff in 2023—it's like someone pushed the entire software engineering profession off a digital ledge! 📉 For years, hiring trended upward as tech companies gobbled up coders faster than I gobble up coffee during grant deadlines. Then WHAM! The machines said "thanks humans, we'll take it from here!" and suddenly software engineers became as rare as dinosaurs at a keyboard. The tiny uptick at the end is probably just the companies hiring the few remaining humans to make sure the AI doesn't decide to turn us all into paperclips. Talk about job security through extinction!

Content me when my science teacher say that the atomic model he explained earlier was a failed model Make4GIF.com

Content Massimo @ @Rainmaker1973 Follow Did you know? NASA only uses 15 digits of n for calculating interplanetary travel. At 40 digits, you could calculate the circumference of a circle the size of the visible universe with an accuracy that'd fall off by less than the diameter of a hydrogen atom. YOUR REACTION WHEN YOU ARE AN ENGINEER WHO ONLY USES 3 DIGITS OFPITO B ILD A SKYSCRAPER:

When you're so deep in mathematical obsession that you start marketing your unsolved millennium problem like it's the next Marvel movie franchise. Nothing says "I've lost touch with reality" quite like releasing a proof in episodic installments while monitoring prediction markets for reactions. The Navier-Stokes equations have claimed another victim! That abstract is what happens when you let ChatGPT write your mathematical papers after feeding it nothing but fluid dynamics textbooks and energy drinks. The real twist ending? The proof was inside us all along... or maybe just inside this guy's imagination.

The generational divide in physics has never been so hilariously accurate! On one side, we've got the "Modern AI-slopper" who cranks out half-baked theories in 30 minutes using ChatGPT, can't format an equation in LaTeX to save their life, and gets defensive when their Reddit posts get criticized. Meanwhile, the "Boomer crackpot" is out here living their best eccentric scientist life – showing up to conferences with physical posters, maintaining a personal website straight out of 1998, hoarding citations like treasure, and somehow having the audacity to email MIT professors directly! The irony? Both are equally passionate about physics while being complete opposites in their approach. Maybe the real breakthrough would happen if they collaborated instead of posting memes about each other! 🔬✨