Energy Equals Mass Times The Singularity Squared

Content If you break the laws of humans, you go to Jail! If you break the laws of God, you go to hell! But if you break the laws of Physics You go to Sweden to to collect your Nobel Prize

The perfect encapsulation of corporate tech babble meets fundamental physics. Someone with impressive credentials just casually decided to "improve" Einstein's iconic equation by... adding AI to it. Because clearly what mass-energy equivalence was missing all these years was a sprinkle of machine learning buzzwords. The single-word "What" response from an actual physicist is the scientific equivalent of a facepalm. This is what happens when LinkedIn influencers try to sound profound while demonstrating they understand neither physics nor AI. The restraint shown by the physicist deserves a Nobel Prize of its own.

Content Name a more iconic duo, I'll wait f(x) g(X)

The perfect illustration of machine learning in its natural habitat! Our protagonist claims ML as their strength, then immediately demonstrates how it actually works—getting the first answer wrong, then blindly repeating the "correct" answer regardless of the new input. This isn't just a coding joke; it's an existential crisis for anyone who's ever built a model that confidently produces nonsense. The algorithm has spoken: 6+9=15, therefore 4+20=15. The math is wrong, but the confidence is unwavering. Just like 90% of the ML models currently running in production somewhere.

Funding agencies suddenly develop interest in theoretical physics once you slap "+AI" onto your equations. The scientific equivalent of sprinkling buzzwords onto your grant application like seasoning on a bland meal. Notice how the funder went from "boring" to "oh!" faster than a particle accelerator. Theoretical physicists have known this trick since the blockchain era - just add whatever technology is currently getting venture capital thrown at it. Next year we'll be solving the Eindinger equation with quantum blockchain NFT metaverse technology.

The eternal academic dilemma of our times! 🧠💻 Here we have a student climbing the treacherous staircase of knowledge built from handwritten papers—a noble but EXHAUSTING journey. Meanwhile, ChatGPT's staircase is practically an escalator to enlightenment! The modern student's internal struggle: "Should I suffer for authenticity or embrace our AI overlords?" Writing papers by hand is like choosing to cross the Atlantic in a rowboat when there's a supersonic jet available. Yet there's that nagging voice saying the journey matters more than the destination... but does it REALLY when your hand is cramping at 3 AM? The academic equivalent of insisting on churning your own butter while living next door to a supermarket!