Meta Meme Peer Review

The original meme plays on the tired "boys vs girls" trope, but someone brilliantly "fixed it" by calling out its inherent misogyny. The bottom panel transforms the format into a meta-commentary on gendered memes themselves, suggesting that what some call "analytic continuation" is really just "domain expansion" of stereotypes. It's essentially scientific terminology being used to critique lazy humor! The historical figure (likely a mathematician or physicist) adds that perfect touch of academic authority saying "Sure thing, but why?" - basically peer-reviewing the meme's premise and finding it severely lacking. Scientific rigor applied to internet culture at its finest!