The Economics Of Gaming Dopamine

The optical illusion that breaks physicists' brains at 3 AM! This is basically Schrödinger's cube – simultaneously existing in two states until you decide which interpretation to observe. Your brain is desperately trying to construct a 3D model from 2D information, flipping between "cube with missing corner" and "two separate cubes" perspectives. It's the geometric equivalent of that dress that nobody could agree on the color of, except this one makes mathematicians cry into their coffee. The real question isn't what you see – it's whether reality exists independent of observation. *adjusts glasses dramatically*

The engineering diagram showing dozens of screw head types has been hilariously repurposed as a taxonomy of mental disorders! Engineers know the frustration of needing exactly the right tool for each specific screw head, but this meme suggests our brains are equally incompatible with standardization. That hexagon head highlighted in green? Clearly the most rational mental state according to whoever made this. Next time your therapist asks how you're feeling, just point to "Phillips slot/ind." and save yourself an hour of conversation.

Someone turned our emotional states into a scientific phase diagram and it's ridiculously accurate! 🤣 This masterpiece plots our moods on two axes: energy level vs pleasantness. The high-energy, unpleasant quadrant gives us "F*** it we ball" energy (when you're stressed but decide to embrace chaos anyway). Meanwhile, the low-energy, unpleasant zone is just "It's so over" (peak depression vibes). The pleasant side ranges from "We are so f***ing back" (high energy celebration) to the zen acceptance of "It is what it is." And don't miss that tiny "Mom would be sad" square - the universal constant keeping us all in check! Thermodynamics of human emotion - who knew physics could explain our daily mood swings so perfectly?

The eternal workplace dichotomy captured in its natural habitat! Designers exhibit classic territorial behavior—experiencing existential dread when another creative joins their ecosystem ("Am I not enough?"). Meanwhile, engineers display the opposite response, embracing new members with primal solidarity ("Apes together strong"). This perfectly illustrates the divergent evolutionary strategies in technical workplaces: designers evolved for specialized individual expression, while engineers developed pack mentality for solving complex problems. It's basically workplace natural selection in action!

The crushing reality of scientific method strikes again. First panel: emotional connection to nature. Second panel: spiritual belonging. Third panel: statistical analysis destroys everything. Fourth panel: existential crisis in a pink skirt. That's the problem with double-blind studies—they're particularly effective at blinding you to your own delusions. Nothing quite like realizing your profound spiritual experience can't beat random chance in a controlled experiment. The data doesn't care about your feelings, and neither does your lab supervisor.

The scientific hierarchy in its full glory! Physicists strutting around like they're the purest science ("It's nice to be on top!"), while mathematicians are so abstract they don't even notice anyone else exists. 🤓 But flip the script to complexity and suddenly everyone's defensive about their turf! Sociologists dealing with unpredictable humans, psychologists ignoring consciousness because it's TOO HARD, and physicists perking up at the mention of "small-scale interactions" like quantum gossip they can't resist. Meanwhile, mathematicians are off in their own dimension, manipulating numbers without units like some kind of reality-free wizards. The ultimate scientific family feud where everyone thinks their problems are the hardest!