At Least I Get My Name On The Table

Twitter asks about books that made people cry. Physics student mentions "University Physics with Modern Physics" textbook. Author Roger Freedman himself responds: "No doubt tears of joy." Sure, Roger. Just like how my tears during thermodynamics finals were "tears of joy." The only joy was finding the correct answer after 17 pages of calculations, only to realize you forgot a negative sign on page 2.

The pinnacle of desperate engineering: a kettle with PVC pipe legs. Someone's created the world's saddest robot while trying to avoid basic physics. Sure, heat rises, but that doesn't mean your kettle needs stilts and a motor to function. This is what happens when you give an engineering student a deadline, three random parts, and absolutely no supervision. The sad part? I've seen worse contraptions get research funding.

Every electrical engineering student after getting zapped by their first circuit! Franklin's single-fluid theory proposed that electricity flowed from positive to negative—but we now know electrons actually flow in the opposite direction. This convention mismatch haunts engineers to this day, forcing them to deal with "conventional current" (positive to negative) while knowing the physical reality is completely backwards. The fiery backdrop perfectly captures the rage of anyone who's ever had to mentally flip directions while troubleshooting a circuit at 3AM. Thanks Ben, you've condemned generations to electrical confusion!

The evolution of physics students is a beautiful disaster. In intro courses, you're crying over a 0.001 decimal point error like it's the end of the world. Fast forward to grad school, and you're casually handwaving order-of-magnitude errors with "eh, close enough." The symbol "\Propto" (proportional to) becomes your new religion—because who needs exact values when you can just say everything is proportional to everything else? By year 5 of your PhD, you're drawing squiggly lines on napkins and calling them "approximate solutions." Welcome to physics, where precision is inversely proportional to your education level.

The ultimate physicist dating matrix! This tensor diagram ranks famous physicists as potential romantic partners - with Marie Curie taking the top spot as both great lover and spouse (she'd definitely make your heart radiate with joy). Meanwhile, poor Newton lands in the "awful lover/awful spouse" corner, probably too busy inventing calculus to learn relationship skills. Einstein sticks his tongue out from the "awful spouse" position - brilliant with relativity, apparently terrible with relativity's cousin: relatives. Feynman occupies the "meh spouse" slot, which tracks for someone who could explain quantum electrodynamics but maybe not remember anniversaries.

Electrons having an existential crisis! The top panels show the classic double-slit experiment where particles behave like waves, creating that beautiful interference pattern when nobody's looking. But the bottom panels? That's what happens when you try to observe which slit the electron goes through - BAM! The wave function collapses into boring particle behavior! It's like catching your quantum friends doing something wild at a party, but as soon as you pull out your camera, they suddenly pretend to be perfectly respectable particles. The monkey's face says it all - "Did... did reality just change because I looked at it?!" Welcome to quantum mechanics, where particles are basically teenagers who act differently when adults are watching! 😱