This Bad Boy Can Hold So Much Physics

When engineers use π = 3 and gravity = 10 m/s², physics weeps but bridges still somehow stand. The gap in this highway is the perfect monument to what happens when you round too aggressively in your calculations. Those people are now contemplating whether to trust the math that got them there or the physics that's about to get them down. Pro tip: Always carry a calculator when approaching civil engineering projects designed by someone who thinks circles are triangles.

The ultimate mashup of quantum physics and moral philosophy! This meme brilliantly combines the famous double-slit experiment and Schrödinger's cat with the trolley problem in ethics. It's basically saying: "Here's a quantum version of the trolley problem where your measurement collapses the wave function and determines who lives or dies—oh, and by the way, you're philosophically ill-equipped to handle this because you're stuck in ancient virtue ethics." The quantum mechanics here is deliciously complex—wave-particle duality, entanglement, and measurement problems all wrapped into one ethical nightmare. In quantum mechanics, particles exist in superpositions until measured, at which point they "collapse" into definite states. Here, your measurement literally determines life and death across multiple possible universes! The final punchline about being a virtue ethicist who missed everything after Aristotle is the chef's kiss—imagine trying to apply Aristotelian ethics to quantum mechanics when you've missed 2,300 years of philosophical and scientific development. Talk about being underprepared for your physics final!

Someone's confusing correlation with causation again. Holding a uranium-rich rock and subsequently feeling ill isn't a matter of personal opinion—it's just basic radiobiology. Next they'll be saying gravity is just a suggestion. The laws of physics don't require your agreement to function, much like how my experiments don't require my lab manager's approval to fail spectacularly.

The eternal truth of scientific textbook lifespans! Physics books become doorstops after a few paradigm shifts (sorry Newton), and chemistry texts turn into historical fiction once we discover new elements or particles. But mathematics? Those ancient theorems from thousands of years ago still crush it in modern classrooms. Pythagoras would totally high-five a calculus student today. The Pythagorean theorem hasn't needed a software update since 500 BCE, while physics and chemistry are basically subscription services with mandatory upgrades. Mathematical truth is the cockroach of academia - utterly indestructible!

Behold the physicist's dating cycle - a phenomenon more predictable than radioactive decay! Meet girl → Talk → She discovers you're a physicist → *POOF* She vanishes faster than a quantum particle! It's like demonstrating conservation of momentum in real time - except the only thing being conserved is your eternal singlehood. The half-life of these interactions is approximately 3.7 minutes, which coincidentally is exactly how long it takes to accidentally mention "string theory" in casual conversation. Scientists are still searching for a theoretical framework to explain why mentioning your physics degree creates a repulsive force stronger than the electromagnetic repulsion between like charges!

The innocent journey into physics starts with pure enthusiasm and curiosity, only to be violently assaulted by 1500-page math textbooks! That cute pink blob gets absolutely destroyed by equations before retreating to chemistry like "never mind, I'll just memorize the periodic table instead." Every physics student knows that moment when you realize Newton was just the tutorial level, and now you're facing the final boss: differential equations with no checkpoints.