Should It Be Youler And Youclid?

Professor: "Is my exam difficult? No, not at all!" The exam: *casually asks you to disprove Fermat's Last Theorem while solving the Riemann Hypothesis during a coffee break* That third question is literally asking you to prove Fermat's Last Theorem without using the 100+ page proof that took mathematicians 358 years to develop. Sure, prof, totally reasonable for a 3-hour exam! Next time just ask us to build a functional time machine using only a pencil and our tears.

Engineers: masters of making things work while absolutely butchering math. The bottom panel shows every mathematician's worst nightmare - those horrifying engineering approximations that somehow still get bridges built. π=3? Screams in mathematician . And sin(x)=x? Sure, for small angles... if you squint really hard. My personal favorite is 0.0001=0 because nothing says "confidence" like just erasing inconvenient decimal points. This is why pure mathematicians need therapy after collaborating with engineers. The bridge might stand, but at what mathematical cost?!

Theoretical physicists skipping the 4th dimension like it's a hotel floor in Asia is peak academic chaos. The author's like "We'll use x 5 for the 5th dimension and just pretend 4 doesn't exist because... reasons!" Then has the audacity to acknowledge this creates confusion but basically shrugs it off with "hopefully context will save us." This is the mathematical equivalent of building a house and labeling the floors G, 1, 2, 5 while mumbling "everyone will figure it out." No wonder string theorists can't agree on anything when they're out here playing interdimensional hopscotch with their indices!

The mathematical community has been trying to solve the Collatz Conjecture for decades, and this genius responds with a completely made-up expression featuring a mysterious symbol and says "trust me." It's the mathematical equivalent of "Source: Dude, just trust me." The beauty here is that mathematicians require rigorous proof for everything, but this person's solution is essentially "I've invented a symbol too complex to explain, but it definitely works!" Classic academic shitposting at its finest.

Ever notice how physicists can take something incredibly dramatic and reduce it to zero with a straight face? This little square dude is explaining the magic of sine waves and averages like it's no big deal. "Yes, we had extreme highs and catastrophic lows, but mathematically speaking... nothing happened!" That's basically how I explain my weekend to my boss on Monday mornings. The ultimate scientific gaslighting technique - proving that something is technically nothing. Next time your experiment explodes, just calculate the average and claim perfect equilibrium!

Behold, the infamous burger algebra! The solution is 5, you mathematical munchkins! If burger = 2, and 2 = 10, then by the transitive property of fast food mathematics, burger = 10/2 = 5! It's like solving for X, except X is delicious and comes with fries. Brain teasers like this are what happen when mathematicians get hungry during exam creation. Next week: calculus with pizza slices! 🍕