Seriously, Math, Physics, Engineering, This Guy Is Everywhere

The "+AI" in the corner gives it away! This isn't a math problem—it's a propaganda problem. Nothing says "intellectual superiority complex" like claiming only ONE person could solve basic arithmetic. The solution is trivial (9+7+14=30), but the real equation here is: [Fabricated Difficulty] + [Appeal to Authority] + [False Exclusivity] = [Gullible Shares]. These "IQ tests" spread faster than gossip in a university department after budget cuts. Next time someone shares this, just respond with "15+1+14=30" and watch their existential crisis unfold in real-time.

The mathematical aristocracy has spoken! First panel shows regular derivative notation (f'(x)) - the bare minimum effort. Second panel upgrades to the fancy Leibniz notation (df/dx) - putting on a tie for the math party. But the third panel? Integration with the monocle? That's pure mathematical nobility. It's like watching calculus climb the social ladder from "I woke up like this" to "I own three vacation properties." Physicists in classical mechanics love their integrals - why solve with derivatives when you can unnecessarily complicate everything with an integral and look sophisticated doing it?

Finding out your date has an Erdős number of 3 or less is basically the mathematician's equivalent of discovering you're dating royalty. For the uninitiated, the Erdős number measures your collaborative distance from legendary mathematician Paul Erdős, who published more papers with more collaborators than anyone in history. The lower your number, the closer you are to mathematical greatness! A 3 or lower? That's like finding out your date casually hangs out with mathematical celebrities. No wonder our protagonist's brain is exploding with excitement - he just went from "nice date" to "I'm definitely putting this on my CV" territory.

Mathematicians really said "We can't solve x² + 1 = 0? Fine, we'll invent a whole new dimension of numbers." Then proceeded to build entire branches of mathematics, electrical engineering, and quantum physics around this made-up solution. Classic human behavior: create an unsolvable equation, refuse to accept defeat, invent imaginary friends for numbers, then use them to build MRI machines and smartphones. The square root of our stubbornness is indeed √(-1).

The professor just delivered a perfect proof by contradiction that would make Euclid shed a tear. If there existed a smallest uninteresting number, that very property would make it interesting—creating a logical paradox. It's the mathematical equivalent of saying "this statement is false." Mathematicians call this the "interesting number paradox," and it's the kind of thing you ponder at 2 AM before a qualifying exam instead of sleeping.

Writing Chinese characters and calling it "math practice" is like claiming you're fluent in quantum mechanics because you can say "Schrödinger's cat." That notebook isn't filled with equations—it's Chinese numerals and characters that would make an actual Chinese math teacher weep into their abacus. Reminds me of my freshman students who think writing gibberish in their lab reports will somehow translate to partial credit. Spoiler alert: it doesn't.