My Answers In The Exam: Mathematical Crimes Against Humanity

Proving convergence? Simple. Just apply the ratio test, maybe squeeze theorem if you're feeling fancy. But finding the actual value? That's when mathematicians start sweating profusely. It's like knowing your package will arrive someday versus knowing exactly when it'll show up at your door. One is a comforting theorem, the other requires actual work.

This is mathematical heartbreak in its purest form! On the left side, our brave mathematician correctly works through the equation, factoring (x-7)(x-7) into a perfect solution. But then—plot twist—they somehow convince themselves that x²-49 equals (x+7)(x-7) on the right. It's like watching someone navigate perfectly to their destination only to make a wrong turn at the very last intersection. That moment when you realize your brain decided to take a coffee break during the most critical step of your math problem. We've all been there... though maybe not quite this spectacularly wrong!

The eternal math battle that divides classrooms everywhere! The happy Pomeranian represents the blissful ignorance of students who think √4 = 2, period. But that shocked, horrified Pom? That's the teacher's reaction when a brave soul mentions the negative root. In the real number system, square roots technically have two values (±2 in this case), but convention dictates we use the positive value when writing √4. The negative solution only appears when solving x² = 4. It's like finding out there's a secret menu at your favorite restaurant that mathematicians have been keeping from you this whole time!

It's a programming pun that'll make electrical engineers snort coffee through their noses! In the top panel, we have an "Integrated circuit" (the actual microchip). But in the bottom panel, we just have "Circuit" - because the programmer forgot to integrate it! Get it? In programming, when you add the letter 'C' to something, you're integrating it (like in calculus). Take away the 'C' and your poor circuit is just sitting there, mathematically derivative and incomplete. Engineering humor at its most gloriously nerdy!

Nothing triggers mathematicians more than sloppy notation. The top panel shows the barbaric "e^x" which makes purists cringe harder than fingernails on a chalkboard. The bottom panel showcases the sophisticated "ArcLog(x)" - the proper way to express natural exponential functions that makes mathematicians nod in approval. Just kidding! It's complete nonsense that would get you expelled from any respectable math department. The joke is that both notations are technically expressing the same thing, but one is needlessly complicated and pretentious. It's mathematical hipsterism at its finest.

Behold! A programmer searching for Fermat's Last Theorem solutions with brute force! The code is checking if a³ + b³ = c³ for any integers—which mathematicians proved impossible centuries ago. Meanwhile, the blue-headed villain has cranked their "Mind size" dial to MEGA, thinking they're a genius for this approach. It's like trying to empty the ocean with a teaspoon while wearing a "Master of Hydrodynamics" badge. Pure computational hubris! The real mathematical joke? This program would run until the heat death of the universe without finding a solution!