A Very Rude Triangle

Dating advice meets Newton's law of universal gravitation! The formula G*m1*m2*r^-2 isn't just for calculating gravitational force—it's apparently the secret formula for attraction between people too! 😂 The joke here is brilliant: according to physics, the attraction between two bodies increases when their masses (m1 and m2) are larger and when the distance (r) between them is smaller (thanks to that negative exponent). So the scientific formula for "attracting girls" is literally... be massive and get closer! Who knew Newton was secretly giving dating tips this whole time? Science pickup lines that actually work—mathematically proven!

Physicists have a special talent for seeing force everywhere. You show them any random combination of mass, length, and time with that peculiar (-2) exponent, and they'll perk up like they've spotted a rare particle in the wild. It's the dimensional analysis equivalent of yelling "squirrel" to a dog. The units ML/T² are basically a mating call for physicists who can't help but classify everything in the universe as either "definitely force" or "force in disguise."

The real question isn't finding the perimeter—it's finding whether this triangle can even exist ! With sides (3a+7), (a-14), and (2a-1), you'd need to satisfy the triangle inequality theorem: the sum of any two sides must exceed the third side. For most values of 'a', that (a-14) side is going negative faster than my motivation during finals week. The student's answer "6a-8" is technically correct for the perimeter, but they skipped the existential crisis of whether this shape is even possible in our reality. Math teachers love throwing these geometric paradoxes at us just to watch our souls leave our bodies.

This meme brilliantly captures the tragic physics of romance! The top graph shows "My love for her" as undamped harmonic motion - consistent, perpetual oscillations that never fade. Meanwhile, "Her love for me" is represented by damped harmonic motion, where the amplitude gradually decreases over time according to that exponential decay function e^(-t/τ). Basically, his feelings keep bouncing back with the same intensity forever, while hers slowly die out due to... friction? Resistance? Commitment issues? Either way, physics has never so perfectly described the pain of unrequited love!

The eternal battle between programmers and mathematicians rages on. In programming languages like C and JavaScript, 3! = 2 is a valid statement because ! is the logical NOT operator, turning 3 (truthy) into false, which equals 0, and then comparing if 0 equals 2 (it doesn't). Meanwhile, mathematicians are having heart palpitations because factorial 3 (3!) equals 6, not 2. The monster represents this mathematical abomination that makes perfect sense in code but is heresy in a math textbook. No wonder the mathematician looks terrified - their entire reality is being threatened by a single punctuation mark.

Ever wondered what happens when math and moral philosophy collide at high speed? This meme takes the infamous trolley problem and gives it a mathematical twist using the Riemann Zeta function! The joke hinges on the bizarre result that 1+1+1+1... (infinitely many 1's) somehow equals -1/2 according to the Riemann Zeta function when evaluated at zero. It's like counting infinite victims and ending up with negative half a person! This is what happens when mathematicians try to solve ethical dilemmas - you either kill infinite people but somehow create half a person (mathematical zombie?), or kill nobody at all. And they say higher math has no practical applications!