When Cables Have A Breaking Point

Scientific journalism: "No one can explain why planes stay in the air." Aerospace engineers: *draws simplistic diagram labeling everything as either "air" or "magic"* The gap between actual aerodynamics (complex differential equations that make calculus professors weep) and how we explain it to the public is basically a rounding error the size of the Grand Canyon. Those 12 years of specialized education? Just trust us, it works.

The most scientifically accurate Venn diagram doesn't exi— Oh wait, here it is! Nothing unites the STEM fields quite like their mutual disdain for each other. Physicists mock engineers who can't win Nobel Prizes, mathematicians scoff at both while being utterly incomprehensible to normal humans, and everyone agrees chemists are inferior (except chemists, who are too busy making things explode to notice). The beautiful irony? They all desperately need each other to make actual scientific progress. It's like a dysfunctional academic family where everyone thinks they're the smart one.

Content VisualParadigm see cool idea like metallic glass lost interest because Icant afford it look up idea and want to do it discover I cant go down research paperrabbithole See if Ican do that without spending any money Discover research papers cost moneyso use schub Look at cost and dis cover it costs thousands of dollars prototype on paper and make basic CAD model

Electric equations got this poor physics student going from confident to confused REAL quick! The first two panels show our hero totally chill with Ohm's Law (V=IR) and its rearrangement (I=V/R) - basic electrical circuit stuff. But then BAM! That third equation (E=ρJ) introducing the microscopic form of Ohm's Law with resistivity and current density just broke their brain! It's that classic moment when your professor says "this is simple" and then throws vector calculus at you without warning. The jump from circuit-level to material-level physics is the academic equivalent of thinking you're walking on solid ground and suddenly falling through a trapdoor!

Engineers solving simple math problems with unnecessarily complex methods is the field's unofficial sport. That equation could be simplified to "5=5" in a heartbeat, but where's the fun in that? Engineering departments worldwide are just math departments with a god complex and more expensive calculators. They'll derive the quantum mechanics of a falling apple when "gravity" would suffice. And they wonder why project budgets always triple...

The eternal battle of our digital age, visualized! This Venn diagram brutally compares working with AI versus engineers, with that tiny overlap zone hitting way too close to home. Engineers with their "this will take 2 weeks" (narrator: it took 6 months) and their context window of approximately the last 5 minutes of conversation. Meanwhile, AI is over there failing silently and wasting compute with reckless abandon. Both share that beautiful middle ground of being dangerously overconfident about untested code. As someone who's survived both worlds, I can confirm this diagram is basically a peer-reviewed publication at this point.