What Did She Say Afterwards?

Before fiber optics and satellites, engineers were like "how do we send data?" Meanwhile, this good boy is ready with the original cone-based technology. Who needs 5G when you've got B-A-R-K transmission? The cone amplifies signals by approximately 100% more guilt when they want treats. Scientists estimate this doggo can broadcast "dinner time" messages across neighborhoods with 99.9% reliability. Still more effective than most Zoom calls.

Content If the proof of a theorem is not immediately apparent, it may be because you are trying the wrong approach. Below are some effective methods of proof that might aim you in the right direction. Proof by obviousness: "The proof is so clear that it need not be mentioned." Proof by general agreement: "All in favor?.. Proof by imagination: "Well, we'll pretend it's true. Proof by convenience: "It would be very nice if it were true, so.. Proof by necessity: "It had better be true, or the entire structure of mathematics would crumble to the ground." Proof by plausibility: "It sounds good, so it must be true." Proof by intimidation: "Don't be stupid; of course it's true!" Proof by lack of sufficient time: "Because of the time constrait, I'lI leave the proof to you." Proof by postponement: "The proof for this is long and arduous, so it is given to you in the appendix." Proof by accident: "Hey, what have we here?!" Proof by insignificance: "Who really cares anyway?" Proof by mumbo-jumbo: Wo ф, 3,830*8=8, Proof by profanity: (example omitted) Proof by definition: "We define it to be true.! Proof by tautology: "It's true because it's true." Proof by plagarism: "As we see on page 289,..." Proof by lost reference: "I know I saw it somewhere....' Proof by calculus: "This proof requires calculus, so we'll skip it." Proof by terror: When intimidation fails Proof by lack of interest: "Does anyone really want to see this?" Proof by illegibility: E GED Proof by logic: "If it is on the problem sheet, it must be true!" Proof by majority rule: Only to be used if general agreement is impossible. Proof by clever variable choice: "Let A be the number such that this proof works.." Proof by tessellation: "This proof is the same as the last." Proof by divine word: " And the Lord said, 'Let it be true, and it was true Proof by stubbornness: "I don't care what you say- it is true." Proof by simplification: "This proof reduced to the statement I + 1 = 2." Proof by hasty generalization: "Well, it works for 17, so it works for all reals." Proof by deception: "Now everyone turn their backs. Proof by supplication: "Oh please, let it be true. Proof by poor analogy: "Well, it's just like...' Proof by avoidance: Limit of proof by postponement as it approaches infinity Proof by design: If it's not true in today's math, invent a new system in which it is. Proof by authority: "Well, Don Knuth says it's true, so it must be!" Proof by intuition: "I have this gut feeling.

Nuclear engineers can't catch a break in the dating world. While most professionals struggle to make their jobs sound interesting, these poor souls are desperately trying to make theirs sound boring! The innuendo potential of "reactivity excursion," "control rod," and "fast breeder reactor" is apparently irresistible to the furry community. Talk about occupational hazards they don't warn you about in grad school! Six figures in Seattle and still can't escape nuclear pickup lines. Maybe try saying you're an accountant next time — nothing kills romantic interest faster than discussing tax deductions and spreadsheets.

Engineers making 5 = 5 with the most unnecessarily complex equation possible? Yep, that tracks! 😂 The Springfield Department of Engineering is showing us the REAL engineering mindset - why solve something simply when you can make it ridiculously complicated? That equation is the engineering equivalent of using a rocket launcher to open a jar of pickles! Every engineering student knows this pain. You spend four years learning calculus, differential equations, and thermodynamics just to end up approximating π as 3 and saying "eh, close enough" in the real world. Engineering: where we make simple things complicated and complicated things "good enough for government work"!

Finally, a troll physics meme that actually obeys the laws of thermodynamics. The classic troll face is suggesting a perpetual motion machine that... actually works? Extract solar energy, use it, then radiate waste heat back to space - congratulations, you've just invented sustainable energy. The punchline is that we're literally doing this already with solar panels. Conservation of energy remains undefeated, but at least we're using the giant fusion reactor 93 million miles away instead of burning dinosaur juice.

These graphs are the most scientifically accurate representation of college majors ever created! Liberal Arts: living the dream until graduation hits like a meteor extinction event. Medicine: suffering through the nine circles of med school hell before finally making enough money to pay off those student loans in your 50s. And Engineering? Just flatline suffering before and after graduation, but hey, at least the paycheck makes the existential dread tolerable! The universal constant across all STEM fields is that brief moment where you question all your life choices and wonder if you should've just opened that beachside coconut stand instead.