The Engineering Enigma: What DO They Actually Do?

The meme perfectly captures that chemical engineering student who learned the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) and now thinks it's the universal solution to every thermodynamic problem. Spoiler alert: using ideal gas equations near critical pressure is like trying to predict weather with a Magic 8-Ball. The ideal gas law assumes gases behave... well, ideally—which they absolutely don't at extreme conditions where molecules start getting clingy with each other. The dog's disappointed expression in the final panel is basically every professor watching students apply oversimplified models to complex systems. It's the thermodynamic equivalent of bringing a plastic spoon to dig the Suez Canal.

The eternal struggle between sensationalist headlines and actual science! When Scientific American claims "No One Can Explain Why Planes Stay in the Air," aerospace engineers everywhere collectively facepalm so hard they generate lift. The engineer's explanation? Just "magic" - because apparently explaining Bernoulli's principle, airfoil dynamics, and pressure differentials for the 800th time gets exhausting. Sometimes it's easier to just say "the plane stays up because of very important magic" than to watch someone's eyes glaze over during your passionate explanation of fluid dynamics. Next week: "Scientists baffled by how magnets work" while physicists quietly contemplate career changes.

Electricity's personality changes drastically with voltage! Low voltage current is like that rule-following nerd who politely asks for permission slips—following conductors and obeying Ohm's law by taking paths of least resistance. High voltage, though? Total chaos energy. It transforms into a raging beast that creates its own conductive plasma channel through AIR ITSELF. That lightning bolt isn't asking for permission—it's tearing through the dielectric breakdown voltage of air (~3 million V/m) and ionizing a path wherever it pleases. It's basically electricity going from "may I please use the designated pathway?" to "I'LL MAKE MY OWN PATH THROUGH LITERAL SPACE!"

Noah's about to reject this unholy academic trio from his ark! 🚫🐘 When pure mathematics, theoretical science, and practical engineering collide, even the wisest beards get confused. It's that moment when your differential equations start wearing lab coats while building bridges—the ultimate disciplinary identity crisis! The engineering elephant looks ready with practical solutions, the mathematics elephant is contemplating abstract proofs in its head, and that science penguin is just waiting to publish a paper on the whole fiasco. Academic disciplines weren't meant to mingle like this... or were they? 🤔

The classic parent-child disappointment, but make it computational. Wanting to learn Python or JavaScript but being stuck with MATLAB is like asking for a gaming PC and getting a scientific calculator. Sure, both do math, but one lets you build Minecraft mods while the other forces you to index from 1 instead of 0 like some kind of mathematical rebel. The computational equivalent of getting socks for Christmas.

The ultimate scientific flex! This Venn diagram perfectly captures the academic food chain where physicists reign supreme. According to this diagram, physicists can mock engineers, get paid well, AND be better than chemists—the STEM field trifecta! Meanwhile, mathematicians are stuck just mocking engineers, engineers can't win Nobel Prizes, and chemists... well, they're apparently everyone's punching bag. The center suggests that the ultimate achievement in science is being better than chemists. Whoever made this was definitely a physicist with an axe to grind and a superiority complex the size of a supermassive black hole. The interdepartmental shade is strong with this one!