Someone Should've Warned Him

Engineering professors love teaching us elaborate mathematical operations that ultimately lead nowhere. This mathematical journey takes you through division, multiplication by gravitational acceleration, multiplication by π, division by Euler's number, and finally applying sine—only to land you right back where you started. It's the mathematical equivalent of walking in a perfect circle while wearing a hard hat and looking serious. The real engineering lesson? How to make simple things unnecessarily complex while maintaining a straight face.

The electronic components fairy strikes again! Just when you think your circuit design is complete, the datasheet gods demand their tribute of extra capacitors and EEs (Electrical Engineers) sprinkle them everywhere like electronic confetti. It's the universal law of electronics: no matter how perfect your design looks, you'll always need "just one more capacitor" for decoupling, filtering, or appeasing the dark magic that makes electronics work. The circuit board never truly reaches its final form!

Looking at a Mollier diagram is the engineering equivalent of trying to read a subway map while riding a rollercoaster. That tangle of pressure, enthalpy, and entropy lines isn't just a graph—it's a visual assault weapon. Engineering students squint at these monstrosities trying to figure out if water is vapor, liquid, or possibly transforming into a fifth state of matter nobody's discovered yet. The second law of thermodynamics should've included "thou shalt not create incomprehensible spaghetti diagrams that make students question their career choices." Prescription glasses companies must make a fortune during thermodynamics semester!

The eternal engineering debate visualized with perfect clarity! On the left, subtractive manufacturing (like CNC machining) where you start with a block and carve away material until your part emerges—represented by a cool blue silhouette chilling in negative space. On the right, additive manufacturing (3D printing) where you build up material layer by layer—shown as a literal human-shaped inferno of creative potential. Engineers secretly judge each other based on this preference. Subtractive folks pride themselves on precision and minimal waste, while additive enthusiasts won't shut up about "unlimited geometric freedom" and how they printed a fully functional whatever last weekend.

The eternal divide between theoretical and practical approaches. Physics students memorize π and e to 15 decimal places as if the universe would collapse otherwise. Meanwhile, engineering students round to the nearest integer because bridges don't care about the 14th decimal place. One is having an existential crisis; the other is getting 8 hours of sleep. Both will argue they're right while drinking coffee at 3 AM before finals.

The classic "I'm an engineer" flex falls spectacularly flat when challenged! Our confident "engenieer" (spelling error included free of charge) gets called out to name 10 formulas and can only muster Newton's Second Law (F = ma). The crushing realization that knowing one formula doesn't make you Nikola Tesla is peak engineering student energy. Even funnier is her admission "that's on me, I set the bar too low" - because honestly, expecting an engineer to remember more than F=ma after finals week is apparently unreasonable.