Engineers And Their Glorious Approximations

The confidence-to-competence pipeline in engineering is just *chef's kiss*. Fresh graduates walking into their first job like "I've got a DEGREE, people! I can handle anything!" only to encounter senior engineers staring at them through a portal to another dimension of knowledge they didn't cover in Thermodynamics 101. That moment when you realize your 4.0 GPA prepared you to understand precisely nothing about real-world engineering problems is truly humbling. The theoretical-to-practical gap isn't a gap—it's the Grand Canyon with a side of existential crisis!

The father-son conversation takes a hilariously dark turn when Dad explains his daughter was named after Venice where Mom "stayed for a long time." The son says thanks, and Dad responds with "No problem, ENGINEERING" – revealing he named his son after what he was doing when the kid was conceived. Classic engineer humor – solving the naming problem with brutal efficiency while completely missing social boundaries. At least he didn't name him "Conference Room Table" or "Back Seat of Toyota Corolla."

Behold the evolution of Mechanical Engineering! From brawny wartime innovations to... *checks notes*... digital boat animations? The "buff doge vs. cheems" format perfectly captures how MechEs went from crafting weaponry that changed world history to typing plot(sin(x)) and watching a little boat wiggle across the screen. Progress? Maybe. Hilarious contrast? Absolutely! Engineering students today are more likely to fight MATLAB syntax errors than actual wars—and honestly, both battles can feel equally traumatic. The real question: which engineer is having more fun?

Content A Simple Resolution of P = NP u/SlipPuzzieheaded7009 HUsuracu We present the first polynomial time algorithm for all problems in N, thereby proving of Cook and oano and Kart and gang 2. our method extends Valiant and gang's algebraic enumeration techniques 3 and 7 (1014 introduction The P vs NP problem- in Cook's 1971 theorem-provino work 1 and Karo's 1972 compilations of IF-complete problems 2 asks whether every problem whose solution can be verified in (n" time can also be solved in O(n) time We prove P = NP by devising a polv time solver that swn thesises circuit constructions a la vallant and gang.3 with certicate guided branching methods (Papadimitriou and gang 4). Our proof is rigorous and breathtakinglv concise mv wite's bovtriend told me so 5) Preliminaries All prior efforts are trivial and naive. Cook-Levin's reduction I is fine: SAI solvers are cute party tricks: POP theorems 6 are delightful and humorous. None saw the obvious that we have. Vain 'Theorem P= NP Proof Left as an exercise for the reader Results and Discussion SAT. CLIOUE. and Hamiltonian Cycle solved in O(n?) time Acknowledgments Tacknowledse. on bebslf of the entire mathematies community. the unparglleled senius of ruself Reterences . A. "The Complexitv of Theorem-Proving Procedures." STOC '71. ACM. 1971 2. Karp. R. M. "Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems." in Complexity of Computer Valiant, L. G. "The Complexity of Enumeration and Reliability Problems." SIAM J. Comput. vol. 8. no. 3, pp. 410-421. 1979. :contentReference oaicite:2 index=2 4. Papadimitrion. C. H.. et al. *On the Complexity of Local Search in Combinatorial Optimize 6. Arora. S.. Safra. S. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP"

Okay, this is GENIUS! These are transistors - the fundamental building blocks of electronics - and they're literally trans -sisters! The meme shows three different types of transistors standing proudly together, just like the trans community. In electronics, these components control current flow and amplify signals - they're basically the unsung heroes that make all our devices work. The wordplay here is just *chef's kiss* perfect! It's a beautiful blend of electrical engineering humor and LGBTQ+ solidarity. Electronic components supporting the transgender community? Now that's what I call positive feedback!

The ultimate historical burn! This meme perfectly captures Edison's notorious reputation for "borrowing" other people's inventions and claiming them as his own. The top portrait shows Nikola Tesla (the original idea guy) while Edison is shown below as the guy who basically took Tesla's brilliant ideas, amplified them with his business acumen and marketing skills, and got all the credit. It's the 19th century equivalent of repeating someone's joke at the meeting but louder and getting all the laughs. The scientific community still hasn't recovered from this historical mic drop!