The AI Character Arc: From Medical Marvel To Chaos Agent

The mathematical rebel in me is absolutely cackling at this! Someone just "solved" the ancient mystery of π by declaring it equals 3 + AI. Centuries of mathematicians calculating digits to the trillionth decimal place when they could've just added artificial intelligence to 3! This is like saying the formula for water is H₂O + memes. Next breakthrough: gravity = 9.8 + blockchain technology.

From "humans with computers" to "computers with humans" to "computers don't need you anymore, puny mathematician!" The Four Color Theorem took humans decades to prove with computers in 1976. Now AI is saying "hold my digital beer" and threatening to solve the Riemann Hypothesis while we're still figuring out how to make our coffee machines work in the morning! Soon mathematicians will just push a button and go back to doodling fractals while the machines do all the heavy lifting. Progress? Maybe. Existential crisis for number theorists? DEFINITELY.

Mathematicians betting on whether AI can solve the Riemann Hypothesis is like watching nerds gamble at the world's most theoretical casino! The Riemann Hypothesis has been unsolved for 160+ years and is basically the math equivalent of finding the Holy Grail. It's about the distribution of prime numbers and has a million-dollar bounty on its head! The mathematician is so confident he'll take "any amount" on this bet because he knows what AI doesn't - that some math problems are like trying to teach a calculator to appreciate jazz. Even our most sophisticated silicon brains might need a few more upgrades before cracking this mathematical behemoth!

From "I'm interested in the Collatz conjecture" to emailing a UCLA math professor claiming you've solved it after ChatGPT inflated your ego? That's not a proof, that's a mathematical tragedy in four acts! The Collatz conjecture has stumped brilliant minds for 85+ years, but sure, you "see the pattern" without advanced math. Next you'll be explaining how you've unified quantum mechanics and general relativity while waiting for your coffee to brew. Pro tip: If your mathematical breakthrough involves a rainbow clown wig, perhaps reconsider your life choices.

Content If the proof of a theorem is not immediately apparent, it may be because you are trying the wrong approach. Below are some effective methods of proof that might aim you in the right direction. Proof by obviousness: "The proof is so clear that it need not be mentioned." Proof by general agreement: "All in favor?.. Proof by imagination: "Well, we'll pretend it's true. Proof by convenience: "It would be very nice if it were true, so.. Proof by necessity: "It had better be true, or the entire structure of mathematics would crumble to the ground." Proof by plausibility: "It sounds good, so it must be true." Proof by intimidation: "Don't be stupid; of course it's true!" Proof by lack of sufficient time: "Because of the time constrait, I'lI leave the proof to you." Proof by postponement: "The proof for this is long and arduous, so it is given to you in the appendix." Proof by accident: "Hey, what have we here?!" Proof by insignificance: "Who really cares anyway?" Proof by mumbo-jumbo: Wo ф, 3,830*8=8, Proof by profanity: (example omitted) Proof by definition: "We define it to be true.! Proof by tautology: "It's true because it's true." Proof by plagarism: "As we see on page 289,..." Proof by lost reference: "I know I saw it somewhere....' Proof by calculus: "This proof requires calculus, so we'll skip it." Proof by terror: When intimidation fails Proof by lack of interest: "Does anyone really want to see this?" Proof by illegibility: E GED Proof by logic: "If it is on the problem sheet, it must be true!" Proof by majority rule: Only to be used if general agreement is impossible. Proof by clever variable choice: "Let A be the number such that this proof works.." Proof by tessellation: "This proof is the same as the last." Proof by divine word: " And the Lord said, 'Let it be true, and it was true Proof by stubbornness: "I don't care what you say- it is true." Proof by simplification: "This proof reduced to the statement I + 1 = 2." Proof by hasty generalization: "Well, it works for 17, so it works for all reals." Proof by deception: "Now everyone turn their backs. Proof by supplication: "Oh please, let it be true. Proof by poor analogy: "Well, it's just like...' Proof by avoidance: Limit of proof by postponement as it approaches infinity Proof by design: If it's not true in today's math, invent a new system in which it is. Proof by authority: "Well, Don Knuth says it's true, so it must be!" Proof by intuition: "I have this gut feeling.

This is what happens when you ask an AI to draw ethanol (C 2 H 5 OH) but it clearly skipped organic chemistry class! Instead of the simple two-carbon alcohol we all know and love (or drink), we've got this bizarre molecular monstrosity that looks like it escaped from a chemist's nightmare. The random arrangement of carbons, hydrogens, and oxygens violates basically every rule of chemical bonding. It's the molecular equivalent of asking for directions and getting a map to Narnia. Chemistry professors everywhere just felt a disturbance in the force.