Great Things Happening At MIT

Dating relationships exist in a quantum superposition until someone tries to measure them. The "more than friends but less than boyfriend" zone is basically relationship purgatory where your status is fundamentally uncertain. Just like a quantum particle, your position in someone's life remains probabilistic until observed—usually through that dreaded "what are we?" conversation. The Schrödinger equation shown here is actually perfect because it describes how quantum states evolve over time, which is exactly what's happening to your dignity while you're trying to figure out if you're allowed to hold her hand at the movies. Pro tip: Unlike quantum mechanics, relationship uncertainty doesn't resolve itself. You'll need to collapse that wavefunction yourself, buddy. No equation will save you from having to use actual words.

The metric vs imperial system debate rages on with handshakes for weight and length conversions, but temperature? That's where civility ends. While 0°C is water freezing, 0°F is just some random point where a guy's salt-brine mixture froze in 1724. No wonder Americans and scientists are always fighting about temperature scales. Meanwhile, Kelvin sits in the corner muttering "you're all technically below zero if you think about it."

The eternal struggle of science students returns! Two distinguished gentlemen (one suspiciously Einstein-like) having what appears to be a calm philosophical discussion by a serene pond—except they're actually contemplating how their lab experiment produced a mind-boggling 347% error. That's not just wrong, that's impressively, spectacularly wrong! It's the kind of error that transcends mere miscalculation and enters the realm of "did we accidentally create a wormhole in the lab?" Physics professors would tell you anything above 5% is concerning, but 347%? That's in the territory of "maybe we discovered new physics" or more likely "we definitely plugged the thermometer into the wrong socket." The perfect visual representation of that moment when you and your lab partner silently acknowledge you'll be spending the entire night redoing the experiment before tomorrow's deadline!

Mathematics just flexed on Physics so hard! 💪 While physicists celebrate their 99.999999% certainty about particle existence (looking at you, Higgs boson discovery), mathematicians are sitting there with their absolute proofs and 100% certainty. The eternal rivalry between theoretical perfection and experimental reality captured in one savage takedown! This is basically the academic version of "I don't deal in probabilities, I deal in absolutes." Next time you're struggling with error bars in lab, just remember that somewhere a mathematician is laughing at your "approximations."

The periodic table's version of "find me a unicorn." Discovering an element between hydrogen (atomic number 1) and helium (atomic number 2) would literally break the fundamental laws of physics. It's like asking a mathematician to find a whole number between 1 and 2. That painful pause wasn't just awkward date silence—it was the sound of a chemist's soul leaving their body while contemplating whether to launch into a lecture on atomic numbers or just nod and hope the appetizers arrive soon. If someone actually managed this impossible feat, they'd need to book their flight to Stockholm immediately. The Nobel committee would have a collective aneurysm trying to comprehend how someone rewrote the entire foundation of modern chemistry.

The ultimate math dad joke of the aerospace world! The meme shows SpaceX rockets at different stages - first as "SPACE X" (multiplication), then as "SPACE Y" (a different variable), and finally as "SPACE X² = Y" (the mathematical equation). It's basically what happens when engineers get bored and start playing with calculus instead of, you know, just launching rockets like normal people. Somewhere, Elon Musk is either crying or frantically filing a patent for mathematical rocket branding. Next up: SPACE ∫(X)dx, where the rocket integrates itself into orbit!