Scientific methods Memes

When Perturbations Aren't Small

13 days ago 3.7K views 0 shares

The physicist is having an existential crisis! Perturbation theory is a mathematical method that relies on small changes (perturbations) to solve complex problems. When these perturbations are small, physicists can approximate solutions beautifully. But suggest those perturbations might NOT be small? Pure mathematical chaos ensues! It's like telling a baker their measuring cups might suddenly be random sizes - their entire recipe framework collapses! The physicist's angry face in the final panel perfectly captures that moment when someone threatens the very foundation of their calculation methods. The entire universe becomes unsolvable!

The Unofficial Scientific Taste-Testing Protocol

Science Chemistry Geology Lab-life Tech

15 days ago 4.9K views 0 shares

The Unofficial Scientific Taste-Testing Protocol

Field guide to scientific taste testing: Chemistry's hard "NO" is the difference between discovery and funeral arrangements. Geologists casually licking rocks to identify minerals is peak field science. Psychologists know better than to sample the human condition directly. Physicists remain baffled by the concept, which tracks with their relationship to practical applications. Zoologists have simply accepted their fate as prey items. Computer scientists testing 9V batteries with their tongues and calling it "debugging." Software engineers desperately trying anything when Stack Overflow fails them. And astronomers... well, they've clearly spent too many nights alone with their telescopes.

Physicist Vs. Engineer: The Eternal Decimal Debate

Physics Engineering Math Academia Science

1 month ago 4.9K views 0 shares

Physicist Vs. Engineer: The Eternal Decimal Debate

The eternal battle between practicality and precision! Engineers live in the messy real world where air resistance ruins their perfect calculations, while physicists clutch their pearls at the thought of rounding off to the third decimal place. Nothing captures the academic tension better than two cats hissing at each other over fundamental philosophical differences. In reality, both are right—engineers need to build things that don't collapse, and physicists need mathematical precision to understand the universe. But they'll die on their respective hills anyway. The funniest part? Both groups still use π=3 when nobody's looking.

Reality Can Be Whatever I Want

Physics Math Science Academia

1 month ago 4.2K views 0 shares

The eternal battle between mathematical rigor and physical intuition! While mathematicians are sweating bullets over the formal rules of calculus, physicists are just vibing with their approximations and cancellations. The equation shown (dB/dt = I·dt) is actually incorrect notation-wise, but that's exactly the point! Physicists will happily mangle mathematical formalism if it gets them to a working model. Who needs mathematical purity when you can just make the universe behave how you want it to? The true power move is deriving correct results from questionable math.

Quik Mafs: The Approximation Divide

Math Physics Engineering Science Academia

1 month ago 5.4K views 0 shares

The fundamental divide in scientific approaches laid bare. Physicists and engineers casually toss around π ≈ 3 and sin(x) ≈ x when the math gets unwieldy. Meanwhile, mathematicians sit there, physically pained by such blasphemy against numerical purity. The horror on their faces when we say "eh, close enough" is worth every decimal point we discard. Nothing triggers a mathematician faster than a good approximation. And yet, somehow our bridges still stand and our rockets still fly.

The Evolution Of Chemical Courage

Chemistry Lab-life Science Scientists Research

1 month ago 5.8K views 0 shares

The evolution of chemical courage depicted through the legendary "buff doge" meme format is both hilarious and historically accurate! Modern chemists freak out over dilute acetic acid (basically fancy vinegar), while 1960s lab warriors casually mouth-pipetted sulfuric acid that could dissolve your insides. But the real MVPs? Those 1860s chemists who literally tasted mustard gas precursors for science. The highlighted text from an actual historical document shows they described the taste as "astringent and similar to horse-radish" right before casually mentioning it destroys your skin and raises blisters. Safety standards really have come a long way—thank goodness!

I'm Doing Taylor Approximations All Day Long

Math Physics Academia Science

1 month ago 6.5K views 0 shares

I'm Doing Taylor Approximations All Day Long

The eternal rivalry between physicists and mathematicians captured in one perfect meme! Physicists live and die by Taylor approximations—those beautiful mathematical shortcuts where we replace complicated functions with polynomials and conveniently "forget" the higher-order terms because they're "negligibly small." When a mathematician calls us out on this mathematical sin, we can only respond with a guilty "But yes." It's the physics equivalent of being caught putting pineapple on pizza and having zero regrets. We'll keep approximating sin(x) as x when x is small enough, thank you very much!

Reject Modernity, Embrace Tradition!

Lab-life Chemistry Research Science Academia

2 months ago 6.2K views 0 shares

Behold the eternal lab equipment dilemma! Modern pipettes with their fancy digital displays and ergonomic designs? *throws beaker dramatically* NONSENSE! The bottom image shows a true scientist from yesteryear, probably counting drops by hand and estimating volumes with nothing but the power of squinting and pure intuition. Back when we didn't need batteries to do science! When precision meant "eh, close enough" and calibration was whatever your professor said it was on Tuesday! Those were the REAL laboratory days—when chemicals occasionally changed your hair color and safety was just a suggestion!

Quantum Philosopher's Stone Coming Soon

Physics Chemistry Science

2 months ago 6.5K views 0 shares

The ultimate scientific showdown we never knew we needed! Medieval alchemists spent centuries trying to turn lead into gold, while modern physicists manipulate quantum information with mathematical precision. But look closer and you'll see they're basically doing the same thing—both trying to transform and manipulate reality through specialized techniques. Distillation, concentration, annealing... chemistry terms that would make both the quantum physicist and the alchemist nod in agreement. It's like discovering your weird medieval ancestor was actually onto something—just missing a few thousand research papers and a particle accelerator!

The Secret Identity Of Forensic Chemistry

Chemistry Lab-life Science

3 months ago 9.2K views 0 shares

The secret identity of forensic chemistry is... analytical chemistry with a crime scene badge. Classic laboratory identity crisis. Forensic chemists are just analytical chemists who got tired of analyzing boring industrial samples and decided dead bodies and crime scenes were more interesting career paths. Their methods are nearly identical—they're both wielding those test tubes like scientific detectives—but one gets invited to murder investigations while the other gets stuck testing water quality. No wonder forensic chemistry wants to keep the mask on. The pay differential alone is worth maintaining the disguise.

Physicist Does Math...

Math Physics Academia Science Scientists

3 months ago 9.0K views 0 shares

The eternal clash between physics and pure mathematics in one perfect frame! Physicists will casually toss out approximations, drop constants, and round π to 3 if it makes their equations work. Meanwhile, mathematicians are having minor heart attacks watching their pristine theorems get mangled in the name of "good enough." The look of absolute horror says it all - "No, no, you can't just say sin(x) ≈ x for small angles and call it a day!" The divide between pragmatic problem-solving and mathematical purity continues to traumatize interdepartmental meetings everywhere.

Double Standards In Scientific Paradise

Lab-life Research Oceanography Science Biology

3 months ago 10.2K views 0 shares

The irony is strong with this one! Scientists telling us to cut down on plastic while their labs look like a Ziploc bag convention gone wild. That mountain of sample bags could probably form its own plastic island in the Pacific. It's the classic "do as I say, not as I do" scenario playing out in real-time. In fairness, scientific research often requires sterile, single-use plastics to prevent cross-contamination—but still, maybe invest in some glass containers or biodegradable alternatives? The researcher's slightly uncomfortable expression says it all: "Yeah, I know... I'm part of the problem." Scientific necessity meets environmental hypocrisy in its natural habitat!

Browse