Quiz Memes

The rare moment when YouTube's auto-generated quiz actually got the math right! Taking the derivative of (3e 4 * x) requires the product rule: (first function × derivative of second) + (second function × derivative of first). Since the derivative of x is 1 and the derivative of 3e 4 is 0 (it's a constant), we get 3e 4 × 1 + x × 0 = 3e 4 . The fourth option is correct, but what's truly miraculous is that an AI quiz generator didn't mess up basic calculus. Next thing you know, YouTube will be solving Fermat's Last Theorem in the comments section!

The quiz question makes perfect sense, unlike the title which is asking for the 5th digit of π in the Fibonacci sequence—a mathematical crime that would make Euler roll in his grave. At least YouTube's algorithm got something right by asking about the golden ratio (1.618), which is actually related to the Fibonacci sequence. It's like asking "What's the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?" and expecting the answer to be "mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell." Mathematical nonsense like this is why mathematicians develop eye twitches by age 30.

The probability paradox strikes again! This delicious self-referential question is the mathematical equivalent of stepping on a LEGO in the dark. If you pick randomly, you have a 25% chance of being correct (1 out of 4 options). But wait—there are TWO options labeled 25% (A and D), doubling your chances to 50%! But then option C says 50%, making it correct instead? The poor guy's brain is melting faster than ice cream in a physics lab. Welcome to the probability version of "this statement is false"—where even the cat looks smugly confident it knows the answer.

The cat's judgmental stare says it all. This probability paradox is the ultimate academic trap. If you pick randomly from four options, you'd expect a 25% chance of being right. But wait—two answers are "25%" (A and D), making their combined probability 50%. So if 25% is correct, it should be 50% likely... which means C (50%) is correct. But if C is correct, then the chance is 25% again. It's an infinite loop of statistical despair that would make Schrödinger's cat roll its eyes. The answer is simultaneously all and none of the above, much like my will to grade another stack of freshman statistics papers.