Proof By History

The mathematical equivalent of shooting yourself in the foot! First panel: panic at a difficult equation. Second panel: pure joy when all the complicated terms cancel out. Third panel: the horrifying realization you've eliminated the very variable you were trying to find. It's like spending hours searching for your glasses while wearing them, only to throw them away once you find them. The mathematical walk of shame every student knows too well.

Who needs approximations when you can be precise? This meme captures that beautiful moment when you realize 9.81 × 9.81 = 96.2361 but everyone's just writing "g²" as 100 m²/s⁴. The difference between "good enough for government work" and "actually correct" is about 3.8%, which is enough to make any physicist twitch uncontrollably. Next time someone rounds gravity to 10 m/s², just stare at them silently until they feel the weight of their mathematical sins.

Mathematical sleight of hand at its finest! This "proof" starts with the innocent truth that 2=2 and then descends through a rabbit hole of increasingly suspicious operations with complex numbers. The punchline? Somehow 2=0. The sneaky culprit here is the mishandling of complex numbers (those pesky i 's). When we reach the step with i² (which equals -1), suddenly the math takes a convenient "forget everything you know about algebra" turn. It's like watching someone build an elegant house of cards and then deliberately sneezing on it. Every math professor has this pinned somewhere in their office as a warning to students who think they can pull a fast one on their homework. Nice try, but we've seen this trick since Pythagoras was in diapers.

The mathematical mind-bender we all needed! Someone's asking how many sides a circle has, and the answers range from "0" to "infinite" with "1" and "2 (inside & outside)" in between. This is actually a fascinating geometry problem that mathematicians have debated. A circle is technically a single curved line (so 1 side?), but that line contains infinite points (so infinite sides?). Or maybe it has 0 sides since it has no straight edges? Or perhaps 2 sides if you count the inside and outside boundaries? Next time you want to see your math professor have an existential crisis, just drop this question during office hours!

This tier list is peak mathematical trolling! The numbers -2, -3, and -5 get S-tier because they're negative versions of actual primes, so they look prime but are actually divisible by -1. Zero slides into A-tier because it's divisible by literally everything except itself (identity crisis much?). Meanwhile, 1 gets relegated to F-tier—the mathematical equivalent of "you had one job" since it's the multiplicative identity that fails the prime test by definition. The empty B-C-D-E tiers are just mathematical shade at this point. Numbers that aren't prime but desperately want to join the cool kids club.

Oh, the mathematical fantasy of yesteryear! Back in the day, a Ph.D. in Math supposedly meant unlimited job options and a salary that would make your calculator overheat. Fast forward to 2024, and most math doctorates are frantically explaining to their parents why they're still eating ramen while debugging code for a startup that pays in "exposure" and promises of stock options. The only equations they're solving now involve calculating how many roommates they need to afford rent! The academic dream vs. reality gap is wider than the distance between parallel lines that supposedly never meet (except in non-Euclidean geometry, which is coincidentally where dreams and reality intersect).