Proof By Expressing 23 As 23/1

This math meme is pure calculus comedy gold! It shows Gumball in three forms representing the same natural logarithm written different ways: First panel: Regular Gumball = ln(x) - the standard natural log notation we all know Second panel: Super Saiyan Gumball = log e (x) - same thing but with the base explicitly shown Third panel: MEGA BRAIN Gumball = log(x)/log(e) - the final boss form using the change of base formula! They're mathematically identical expressions getting progressively more unnecessarily complex. It's like meeting someone and saying "Hello" vs "Greetings, carbon-based life form, I wish to initiate verbal exchange protocols!"

Someone circled "3.14!" and wrote "Really?" next to it, because that's not how factorial notation works in mathematics. Pi (3.14159...) with an exclamation mark looks like "3.14!" which in math means "3.14 factorial" - the product of all positive integers less than or equal to 3.14. But you can't take the factorial of a non-integer! That's like asking someone to count to blue. The mathematician seeing this is probably having a minor stroke right now. It's the mathematical equivalent of nails on a chalkboard.

This is what happens when physics and art collide! The meme brilliantly pokes fun at General Relativity's effect on our perception of space. That "perfect square" looks like a quadrilateral that got caught in a gravitational field! The joke hinges on the fact that in curved spacetime, what appears straight locally can be bent globally. Writing down the metric tensor (which describes this curvature mathematically) is indeed the challenging part - it's basically trying to explain why your "square" looks like it was drawn by a kindergartner after three juice boxes. Einstein would be proud... of your attempt, at least.

Every math professor's internal monologue when someone says "our profits grew exponentially" without specifying the base or exponent. The mathematical rage is real! Exponential growth follows a specific pattern (y = bˣ), not just "it got bigger fast." The goose is all of us who've spent years teaching this concept only to hear it butchered in corporate meetings. Next time someone uses "exponentially" loosely, channel your inner angry waterfowl and demand the rate constant!

The punchline is the mathematical bamboozle! What looks like a complex function f(x,y) turns out to be just multiplication. The first three equations show 1×4=5 , 2×5=12 , and 3×6=21 - which are all wrong! The character's smug expression perfectly captures that moment when you realize these viral math puzzles are deliberately designed with incorrect operations to spark internet arguments. The answer to f(8,11) should be 88 if following the multiplication pattern, but honestly, who cares? It's a trap designed to make people fight in comment sections while engagement metrics soar. Next time you see one of these, just remember: the real function is generating ad revenue.

Someone's desperately circling a random part of the Mandelbrot set like they've discovered the mathematical equivalent of Atlantis! 😂 The Mandelbrot set is literally INFINITE in complexity - you can zoom forever and keep finding new patterns. It's like telling everyone you've discovered a "strange new fish" while pointing at the ocean. Congratulations, you've found fractals doing exactly what fractals do! Next breakthrough: discovering that water is wet and circles are round! 🧠💥