Mathematicians Break Reality With Infinity 2

The laziest mathematical proof in history! 😂 Instead of doing all the hard work to prove π is irrational, this mathematician just says "well, someone already proved it in 1761, so... we're done here!" It's like citing your smart friend's homework as your entire solution! Every math student's dream proof technique - "Because someone smart said so." If only my calculus professor would accept "Lambert proved it, case closed" as a valid answer on exams!

Dividing by zero has tormented mathematicians for centuries, and here we have someone boldly claiming it equals -1/12! This is actually referencing the infamous sum of all natural numbers (1+2+3+...) which, through some mathematical wizardry called analytic continuation, equals -1/12. It's the mathematical equivalent of saying "the answer to life is 42" – technically wrong by conventional rules, but hilariously embraced by theoretical physicists who actually use this result in string theory calculations. Your math teacher would have an aneurysm seeing this!

Normal derivatives? Piece of cake. Second derivatives? No problem. But throw a fractional derivative at a math student and watch their soul leave their body. That half-derivative is the mathematical equivalent of finding out your calculator wasn't in degree mode during the entire exam. The beauty of math is how it lulls you into a false sense of security before dropping the non-integer order differential hammer on your fragile confidence. Next time someone tells you math is straightforward, just whisper "half-derivative" and enjoy the panic in their eyes.

The math trivia question that makes calculus students break into cold sweats! Zero raised to zero power is the mathematical equivalent of dividing by zero's slightly less catastrophic cousin. Mathematicians have been fighting over this one for centuries - some say it's 1 (because anything raised to zero is 1), others claim it's undefined (because zero raised to any power is 0), and a few rebels insist it's π/4 just to watch the world burn. Pro tip: if this comes up during your math final, just fake a sudden illness and run.

Congratulations! You've encountered the rare fruit-based mathematical puzzle that's somehow harder than proving the Riemann hypothesis. The equation suggests apple + mango = orange, while the bottom shows apple, mango, orange, pineapple ∈ N (meaning they're all natural numbers), with pineapple > 2. It's essentially a system of Diophantine equations disguised as produce. The 99.9% statistic is generous—even my calculator just threw itself out the window. The only people solving this are either Fields Medalists or those who realize it's completely made up to make you feel inadequate about your fruit-counting abilities.

The mathematical horror story in two panels! That moment when you realize Euler's identity (e iπ = -1) is correct, but then someone tries to "simplify" it with a square root and creates a mathematical abomination. The cartoon character's progression from confidence to confusion is basically every math student hitting that point in the semester where elegant equations suddenly transform into eldritch horrors. The square root of negative one is already imaginary—we don't need to make it extra imaginary by butchering beautiful equations!