When Your CAD Software Decides To End Your Career

Welcome to the corporate dystopia of "smart cities" planning! Two team members immediately jump to surveillance-based solutions—one suggesting "Minority Report" pre-crime AI (because nothing says urban planning like arresting people before they drive badly), and another brilliantly proposing "1984" surveillance (because traffic congestion is definitely solved by Big Brother watching you). Meanwhile, the quiet engineer in the corner suggests actual math and science: graph theory to optimize the street grid into a more efficient tree structure while adapting speed limits. Naturally, this person gets thrown out the window. Can't have actual solutions interfering with our dystopian surveillance fantasies! Fun fact: Graph theory has been used to solve real traffic problems since the 1950s, but why use proven mathematics when you can just slap "AI" on a proposal and get triple the funding?

Content Quarantine @26.3301 Engineering students with no social life

Engineers proudly declaring they don't know basic math while simultaneously denying it has anything to do with their profession is peak engineering culture. The beautiful contradiction of someone presenting a slide that says "Just because we are engineers doesn't mean we know basic math" followed by the panicked clarification "I mean, we don't, but not because we're engineers!" is exactly why calculators were invented. Engineers will design a nuclear reactor but panic when asked to divide by hand. They're not bad at math because they're engineers—they're engineers because they're clever enough to find ways around doing math!

The imperial system strikes again! While the metric side calmly states "2 Bar = exceeds atmospheric pressure by twice the pressure of the atmosphere," the imperial side goes full medieval manuscript with "29 PSI = exceeds atmospheric pressure by 29 times the weight of 7,000 grains of wheat spread over a square area the length of three grains of sound ripe barley being taken out the middle of the ear, well dried, and laid end to end in a row." This is why scientists worldwide collectively facepalm when dealing with unit conversions. The absurd complexity of imperial measurements makes rocket science look like counting fingers. Next time someone asks why we need the metric system, just show them this tire.

The engineer's solution to a non-right triangle? Just scribble out that pesky non-90° angle and draw in a perfect right angle! Who needs mathematical integrity when you can just redraw reality? This is basically the engineering equivalent of "have you tried turning it off and on again?" but for geometry. Pure engineering pragmatism at its finest—if the math doesn't fit your needs, just modify the universe until it does!

Engineering students sobbing their way through partial differential equations while art majors watch movies? Yep, that's college in a nutshell! The Navier-Stokes equations are basically the final boss of fluid dynamics - they describe how viscous fluids flow and are notoriously difficult to solve analytically. Meanwhile, art students get to analyze Ryan Gosling dancing with Emma Stone. The mathematical trauma is real! Those equations govern everything from blood flow to weather patterns, but good luck solving them without having an existential crisis in your car first. Engineering degree = tears with mathematical notation.